Joao Sousa vs Luciano Darderi — Prague CH Quarter-final

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POR5
Joao Sousa
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
Luciano Darderi
ITA3
Luciano Darderi
#18ATP
1835ELO
1836Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
Sousa J.
7-5 3-6 7-6
Darderi L.
Sousa J.
73772
Darderi L.
56631

Joao Sousa defeated Luciano Darderi 7-5 3-6 7-6 in the Prague CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Joao Sousa came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Joao Sousa extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Joao Sousa closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-14Rome MastersQ1clayJoao Sousa3-6 6-3 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Sousa J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Darderi L.

Darderi L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Serve advantage — Darderi L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Sousa J.Darderi L.
—
Serve
46
—
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sousa J.Darderi L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sousa J.Darderi L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
35
78
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Dominant
14
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sousa J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Darderi L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
0.6
Surface form
8.4
0.0
Win streak
9.06-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sousa J.Darderi L.
Freshness·
—
100

Darderi L.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.[7]
Ofner S.[8]
7-676-3
Mensik J.
Koepfer D.[6]
6-46-3
Molleker R.[4]
Debru G.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[8]
Klein L.
7-640-66-3
Stricker D.[7]
Krajinovic F.[1]
7-55-76-3
Mensik J.
Moro Canas A.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.[6]
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Molleker R.[4]
Vacherot V.[8]
6-47-65
Debru G.
Sousa J.[5]
5-76-36-4
Quarter-finals
Krajinovic F.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.
6-37-5
Ofner S.[8]
Barrios Vera T.
6-27-5
Stricker D.[7]
Svrcina D.
4-66-16-3
Kicker N.
Laaksonen H.
W/O
Koepfer D.[6]
Klein L.[4]
6-46-766-1
Moro Canas A.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-4
Mensik J.
Santillan A.
3-66-37-66
Debru G.
Kodat T.
7-646-736-4
Vacherot V.[8]
Paulson A.
7-656-2
Molleker R.[4]
Gomez F.
6-36-3
Sousa J.[5]
Darderi L.[3]
7-53-67-63
R16
Koepfer D.
Gombos N.
6-23-66-3
Klein L.
Agamenone F.
6-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Stricker D.[7]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-756-26-4
Krajinovic F.[1]
Gaio F.
6-24-66-4
Svrcina D.
Paulson A.
6-13-66-0
Barrios Vera T.
Kopriva V.
6-25-77-67
Kolar Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-56-3
Koepfer D.[6]
Furness E.
7-660-0
Santillan A.
Hardt N.
4-66-46-3
Mochizuki S.
Gombos N.[3]
7-687-62
Kicker N.
Fatic N.
7-56-4
Laaksonen H.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-36-766-2
Mensik J.
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Moro Canas A.
Svajda Z.
6-42-66-4
Klein L.[4]
Andreozzi G.
5-76-36-3
Vacherot V.[8]
Mena F.
6-26-4
Sousa J.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-04-66-4
Darderi L.[3]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-1
Debru G.
Nicod J.
7-56-1
Gomez F.
Giustino L.
6-36-3
Molleker R.[4]
Chazal M.
6-26-2
Paulson A.
Erhard M.
6-36-3
Kodat T.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Debru G.
Nicod J.
7-56-1
R32
Machac T.[6]
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-16-1
Kolar Z.
Bellier A.
3-66-37-65
Gaio F.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Gombos N.
Piros Z.[5]
2-2
Koepfer D.
Delbonis F.
6-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Martinez P.
6-23-0
Kopriva V.
Sachko V.
5-77-56-2
Paulson A.
Peniston R.
2-67-56-1
Ofner S.[8]
Demin Y.
6-46-756-1
Stricker D.[7]
Ivanovski K.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Sels J.
6-26-746-1
Barrios Vera T.
Albot R.[2]
6-36-3
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-36-1
Agamenone F.
Gaston H.[4]
7-57-5
Klein L.
Valkusz M.
6-41-66-1
Krajinovic F.[1]
Choinski J.
6-44-66-2
Moro Canas A.
Harris B.
6-23-66-0
Koepfer D.[6]
Elias G.
1-1
Mensik J.
Albot R.[1]
7-644-66-3
Fatic N.
Added D.
5-76-46-3
Laaksonen H.
Stricker D.[2]
7-54-66-1
Sachko V.
Geerts M.
6-16-1
Svajda Z.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-1
Furness E.
Kolar Z.
6-46-3
Kicker N.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-37-63
Andreozzi G.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Hardt N.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Klein L.[4]
Demin Y.
7-56-1
Gombos N.[3]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Vesely J.
6-47-5
Santillan A.
Tseng C.[8]
6-36-0
Mochizuki S.
Vrbensky M.
7-56-3
Erhard M.
Maestrelli F.
7-605-76-3
Vacherot V.[8]
Kivattsev K.
6-46-4
Kodat T.
Hemery C.
6-41-66-2
Nicod J.
Barton H.
1-66-36-2
Vrbensky M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-5
Paulson A.
Cias P.
6-46-4
Forejtek J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-66-4
Laaksonen H.
Bourgue M.[7]
4-67-636-2
Mena F.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-3
Giustino L.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Chazal M.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Gomez F.
Squire H.[6]
4-66-46-3
Sousa J.[5]
Royer V.
6-46-1
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-777-65
Debru G.
Neumayer L.[1]
2-66-36-4
Molleker R.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Nicod J.
Barton H.
1-66-36-2