Federico Agustin Gomez vs Miguel Damas — Prague CH Qualifying Round 2

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
ARG4
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
ESP
Miguel Damas
#300ATP
1398ELO
1370Clay ELO
26 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLLLL
Gomez F.
6-2 6-2
Damas M.
Gomez F.
662
Damas M.
220

Federico Agustin Gomez defeated Miguel Damas 6-2 6-2 in the Prague CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Damas M.

Damas M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez F.Damas M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
1.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez F.Damas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
0
Break points saved·Dominant
82
29
Break points won·Even
18
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
49

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez F.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Damas M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.9+40 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Clay Elo 1370
4.9Overall Elo 1445
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1398
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
4.4
4.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gomez F.Damas M.
Freshness·Slight edge
59
49

Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d) · Damas M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 119 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[8]
Houkes M.
4-66-47-5
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Moro Canas A.[12]
6-26-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Hrazdil J.
7-626-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Domingues J.
6-33-66-3
Gaio F.
Laaksonen H.[4]
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[1]
Molleker R.
6-06-3
Andreozzi G.[6]
Rybakov A.[11]
6-36-3
Harris B.[8]
Damm M.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Stodder T.[9]
7-666-2
Rincon D.[5]
Artnak B.
6-26-2
Elias G.[10]
Prihodko O.
7-646-3
Molleker R.[7]
Sachko V.[1]
6-46-2
Kivattsev K.[8]
Filip J.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.[5]
6-26-3
Gomez F.[4]
Damas M.
6-26-2
Debru G.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-16-0
Cias P.
Donski A.
7-617-67
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
Vrbensky M.[1]
Faria J.[9]
6-36-4
Q1
Laaksonen H.[4]
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Squire H.
6-26-3
Domingues J.
Gengel M.[10]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-3
Molleker R.
Lazarov A.[11]
7-54-67-65
Houkes M.
Mochizuki S.[5]
7-636-3
Moro Canas A.[12]
Barnat J.
7-57-5
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Rosol L.
2-66-36-4
Hrazdil J.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-4
Gaio F.
Yevseyev D.[9]
6-06-756-3
Choinski J.[1]
Harris B.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Andreozzi G.[6]
Manafov V.
6-26-4
Rybakov A.[11]
Rikl P.
7-657-5
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.[2]
6-36-2
Stodder T.[9]
Filip J.
3-66-46-4
Harris B.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Gengel M.[3]
6-26-0
Artnak B.
Paulson A.[12]
4-66-36-4
Rincon D.[5]
Brunclik P.
6-16-767-63
Elias G.[10]
Bolardt A.
6-27-5
Molleker R.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[1]
Haerteis J.
5-76-26-1
Prihodko O.
Domingues J.[4]
6-45-76-3
Nicod J.
Milev Y.[12]
4-66-16-2
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Piraino G.[7]
7-56-3
Damas M.
Butvilas E.[11]
6-46-4
Filip J.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-36-3
Kivattsev K.[8]
Barnat J.
6-46-1
Donski A.
Potenza L.[10]
6-26-3
Cias P.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-44-66-4
Faria J.[9]
Siniakov D.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Milev Y.
4-66-16-2
Debru G.[3]
Metreveli A.
6-27-5
Vrbensky M.[1]
Kielan S.
6-26-4