Carlos Taberner vs Oliver Crawford — Augsburg CH Round of 16

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
Oliver Crawford
GBR
Oliver Crawford
#235ATP
1444ELO
1373Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWLWLL
Taberner C.
3-6 6-4 7-6
Crawford O.
Taberner C.
36772
Crawford O.
64631

Carlos Taberner defeated Oliver Crawford 3-6 6-4 7-6 in the Augsburg CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Crawford O.

Crawford O.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Crawford O.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Crawford O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
12
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
64
Break points won·Dominant
59
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
19
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Crawford O.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.9+232 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1373
7.1Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1444
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Roca Batalla O.
Zanellato N.
6-36-4
Taberner C.
Stodder T.[7]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Stodder T.[7]
Hassan B.[2]
4-67-645-3
Zanellato N.
Echargui M.
7-56-1
Taberner C.
Ferrari G.
6-46-1
Roca Batalla O.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-4
R16
Serdarusic N.
Martineau M.
6-34-66-4
Hassan B.[2]
Bailly G.
6-46-4
Stodder T.[7]
Martin A.
6-16-1
Taberner C.
Crawford O.
3-66-47-63
Ferrari G.
Wessels L.
6-26-4
Zanellato N.
Moeller M.
3-67-56-4
Echargui M.
Gerch L.
6-36-4
Roca Batalla O.
Diez S.[4]
6-16-4
R32
Martin A.
Habib H.
7-643-67-62
Moeller M.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[8]
2-66-26-0
Stodder T.[7]
Houkes M.
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.
Guinard M.[5]
6-11-0
Gerch L.
Casanova H.[1]
5-4
Taberner C.
Burruchaga R.[3]
6-16-4
Hassan B.[2]
Masur D.
6-27-64
Bailly G.
Topo M.
6-16-2
Crawford O.
Fonio G.
6-26-3
Ferrari G.
Harris B.
6-716-16-4
Wessels L.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[6]
7-57-62
Martineau M.
Weis A.
6-25-76-4
Diez S.[4]
Pichler D.
6-36-786-1
Zanellato N.
Ejupovic E.
3-66-46-2
Echargui M.
Rocha H.
6-16-1
Roca Batalla O.
Negritu C.
6-26-766-3