Ignacio Buse vs Daniel Dutra Da Silva — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ignacio Buse
PER
Ignacio Buse
#33ATP
1822ELO
1786Clay ELO
$949kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
clay
BRA7
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
#426ATP
1307ELO
1282Clay ELO
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Buse I.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Buse I.
3662
Dutra Da Silva D.
6321

Ignacio Buse defeated Daniel Dutra Da Silva 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Ignacio Buse came in ranked #33, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Buse I.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dutra Da Silva D.

Dutra Da Silva D.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Buse I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
41
Serve
—
8
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
63
0
Break points saved·Dominant
87
14
Break points won·Slight edge
28
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Buse I.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 301 days (−1.5)
Dutra Da Silva D.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.6+504 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.4Clay Elo 1282
9.8Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1307
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.6
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Buse I.Dutra Da Silva D.
Freshness·Even
98
100

Buse I.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Dutra Da Silva D.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Guillen Meza A.
Bicknell B.
7-636-1
Darderi L.
Navone M.
4-66-37-5
Semi-finals
Bicknell B.
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
3-67-666-3
Guillen Meza A.
Olivo R.[2]
7-57-5
Darderi L.
Tabilo A.
7-54-66-3
Navone M.
Comesana F.[8]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Guillen Meza A.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Bicknell B.
Buse I.
3-67-626-4
Olivo R.[2]
Bueno G.[8]
4-66-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Lama G.[6]
6-27-66
Navone M.
Andreozzi G.
6-22-2
Tabilo A.
Burruchaga R.
6-27-5
Darderi L.
Varillas J.[1]
6-766-36-0
Comesana F.[8]
Galan D.[3]
6-46-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
7-52-66-2
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Sakamoto P.
5-76-06-0
Bueno G.[8]
Andrade A.
6-36-2
Buse I.
Vallejo A.
7-57-64
Bicknell B.
Ficovich J.[1]
7-54-66-3
Olivo R.[2]
Villanueva G.
0-66-36-4
Guillen Meza A.
Heide G.[5]
6-22-67-64
Lama G.[6]
Otegui J.
7-686-4
Andreozzi G.
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-25-76-4
Comesana F.[8]
Ymer E.
6-44-66-4
Tabilo A.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-36-4
Burruchaga R.
Lavagno E.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-26-0
Darderi L.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Navone M.
Guillen Meza A.
6-36-2
Galan D.[3]
Giannessi A.
6-46-3
R32
Heide G.[5]
Monzon I.
6-06-736-1
Andrade A.
Aboian L.
6-36-4
Otegui J.
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-4
Olivo R.[2]
Huertas Del Pino C.
3-67-57-5
Villanueva G.
Prado Angelo J.
6-31-67-5
Sakamoto P.
Justo G.
6-47-65
Dellien Velasco M.[4]
Alves M.
6-12-66-0
Ficovich J.[1]
Farjat T.
6-17-61
Huertas Del Pino A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-41-66-3
Vallejo A.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Leite W.
6-16-3
Buse I.
Dutra Da Silva D.[7]
3-66-36-2
Bicknell B.
Lilov V.
6-26-4
Guillen Meza A.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Bueno G.[8]
Cossu M.
6-26-3
Lama G.[6]
Panta Herreros J.
6-746-47-5
Reis Da Silva J.
Vacherot V.
6-36-0
Varillas J.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-646-786-4
Navone M.
Coria F.[2]
6-47-64
Guillen Meza A.
Buse I.
6-726-36-4
Andreozzi G.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-36-3
Galan D.[3]
Alves M.
3-66-17-65
Huertas Del Pino C.
Diaz Acosta F.[5]
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Feldbausch K.
6-43-67-5
Ymer E.
Agamenone F.
3-66-16-4
Comesana F.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-46-2
Lavagno E.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
6-42-66-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Dellien H.[6]
6-46-1
Giannessi A.
Roca Batalla O.
1-66-36-2
Tabilo A.
Vallejo A.
6-46-1
Burruchaga R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-16-2
Huertas Del Pino A.
Crawford O.
7-56-0