Jack Draper vs Nuno Borges — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
hard
Nuno Borges
POR
Nuno Borges
#52ATP
1769ELO
1714Hard ELO
$811kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLWL
Draper J.
6-3 6-1
Borges N.
Draper J.
662
Borges N.
310

Jack Draper defeated Nuno Borges 6-3 6-1 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Borges N.

Borges N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Draper J.Borges N.
—
Serve
36
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Borges N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.1
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (156 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Borges N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
88
77
Break points saved·Even
99
98
Break points won·Dominant
83
54
Deciding sets·Even
96
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Borges N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+68 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Hard Elo 1714
7.3Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1769
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
6.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Borges N.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
93

Draper J.: 17 days rest · Borges N.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[6]
Lehecka J.[5]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.[5]
Korda S.[3]
W/O
Baez S.[6]
Coric B.[1]
6-36-747-62
Quarter-finals
Coric B.[1]
Cerundolo J.
6-36-1
Baez S.[6]
Djere L.[4]
6-36-0
Korda S.[3]
Gasquet R.[12]
4-66-17-67
Lehecka J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-646-4
R16
Purcell M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
7-647-62
Cerundolo J.
Kumar O.
7-56-3
Gasquet R.[12]
Nakashima B.
2-66-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Michelsen A.
6-46-4
Baez S.[6]
Vukic A.[9]
6-44-66-4
Coric B.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-46-736-3
Korda S.[3]
Fucsovics M.[14]
7-656-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Koepfer D.
6-33-66-4
R32
Vukic A.[9]
Van Assche L.
6-36-756-3
Baez S.[6]
Galan D.
3-66-46-4
Korda S.[3]
Bonzi B.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Krueger M.
2-66-26-3
Coric B.[1]
Hijikata R.
6-27-62
Gasquet R.[12]
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[2]
Draper J.
7-680-0
Cerundolo J.
Hanfmann Y.[10]
7-635-77-64
Nakashima B.
Fils A.[7]
6-757-656-2
Fucsovics M.[14]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Purcell M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Giron M.[13]
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
6-37-5
Michelsen A.
Ofner S.[15]
7-647-5
Djere L.[4]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-3
Koepfer D.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-2
R64
Hijikata R.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-2
Mmoh M.
King D.
6-23-66-3
Michelsen A.
Varillas J.
6-36-736-0
Nakashima B.
Kubler J.
6-13-67-63
Zhang Z.
Ivashka I.
4-67-676-2
Bonzi B.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Koepfer D.
Lestienne C.
6-43-67-68
Draper J.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Kumar O.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Huesler M.
Shevchenko A.
6-34-64-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Halys Q.
4-66-26-4
Krueger M.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Van Assche L.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-36-2
Galan D.
Albot R.
6-17-5
Cerundolo J.
Safiullin R.
7-653-66-3
Purcell M.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-1