Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Quentin Halys — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Facundo Diaz Acosta
ARG
Facundo Diaz Acosta
#120ATP
1681ELO
1533Hard ELO
$264kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 21 August 2023
hard
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#95ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Diaz Acosta F.
4-6 6-2 6-4
Halys Q.
Diaz Acosta F.
4662
Halys Q.
6241

Facundo Diaz Acosta defeated Quentin Halys 4-6 6-2 6-4 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #95.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diaz Acosta F.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Halys Q.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Diaz Acosta F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Diaz Acosta F.Halys Q.
—
Serve
35
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Diaz Acosta F.Halys Q.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
34%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
11.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diaz Acosta F.Halys Q.
Clutch Rating·Even
60
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
97
Break points won·Dominant
33
4
Deciding sets·Even
70
74
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
83
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diaz Acosta F.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 35 days (−1.0)
Halys Q.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Hard Elo 1533
Surface ELO
7.3+144 Hard Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1681
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1707
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diaz Acosta F.Halys Q.
Freshness·Dominant
53
84

Diaz Acosta F.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 125 games (7d) · Halys Q.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.[6]
Lehecka J.[5]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.[5]
Korda S.[3]
W/O
Baez S.[6]
Coric B.[1]
6-36-747-62
Quarter-finals
Coric B.[1]
Cerundolo J.
6-36-1
Baez S.[6]
Djere L.[4]
6-36-0
Korda S.[3]
Gasquet R.[12]
4-66-17-67
Lehecka J.[5]
Purcell M.
7-646-4
R16
Purcell M.
Griekspoor T.[2]
7-647-62
Cerundolo J.
Kumar O.
7-56-3
Gasquet R.[12]
Nakashima B.
2-66-46-4
Djere L.[4]
Michelsen A.
6-46-4
Baez S.[6]
Vukic A.[9]
6-44-66-4
Coric B.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-46-736-3
Korda S.[3]
Fucsovics M.[14]
7-656-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Koepfer D.
6-33-66-4
R32
Vukic A.[9]
Van Assche L.
6-36-756-3
Baez S.[6]
Galan D.
3-66-46-4
Korda S.[3]
Bonzi B.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.[5]
Krueger M.
2-66-26-3
Coric B.[1]
Hijikata R.
6-27-62
Gasquet R.[12]
Huesler M.
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[2]
Draper J.
7-680-0
Cerundolo J.
Hanfmann Y.[10]
7-635-77-64
Nakashima B.
Fils A.[7]
6-757-656-2
Fucsovics M.[14]
Zhang Z.
6-46-2
Purcell M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Giron M.[13]
6-36-4
Kumar O.
Van De Zandschulp B.[8]
6-37-5
Michelsen A.
Ofner S.[15]
7-647-5
Djere L.[4]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-3
Koepfer D.
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-2
R64
Hijikata R.
Marchenko I.
4-66-36-2
Mmoh M.
King D.
6-23-66-3
Michelsen A.
Varillas J.
6-36-736-0
Nakashima B.
Kubler J.
6-13-67-63
Zhang Z.
Ivashka I.
4-67-676-2
Bonzi B.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Koepfer D.
Lestienne C.
6-43-67-68
Draper J.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Kumar O.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Huesler M.
Shevchenko A.
6-34-64-0
Diaz Acosta F.
Halys Q.
4-66-26-4
Krueger M.
Kotov P.
6-36-4
Van Assche L.
Kwiatkowski T.
3-66-36-2
Galan D.
Albot R.
6-17-5
Cerundolo J.
Safiullin R.
7-653-66-3
Purcell M.
Cecchinato M.
6-46-1