Clement Tabur vs Zsombor Piros — Todi CH Round of 16

Todi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN1
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Tabur C.
6-0 6-1
Piros Z.
Tabur C.
662
Piros Z.
010

Clement Tabur defeated Zsombor Piros 6-0 6-1 in the Todi CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
30
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
84
Break points won·Slight edge
23
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
85
Tiebreaks·Even
45
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Clay Elo 1553
Surface ELO
6.6+67 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1661
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Piros Z.
Freshness·Clear edge
69
48

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d) · Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Darderi L.[7]
Tabur C.
6-46-756-1
Semi-finals
Darderi L.[7]
Maestrelli F.
7-676-4
Tabur C.
Fonio G.
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Maestrelli F.
Debru G.
7-646-4
Darderi L.[7]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-06-1
Fonio G.
Gill F.
6-36-4
Tabur C.
Echargui M.
6-43-67-67
R16
Sanchez Jover C.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-37-5
Tabur C.
Piros Z.[1]
6-06-1
Maestrelli F.
Serdarusic N.
6-26-746-2
Darderi L.[7]
Zekic M.
6-46-4
Fonio G.
Ocleppo J.
6-36-756-4
Echargui M.
Geerts M.
6-26-1
Debru G.
Erhard M.
6-42-66-4
Gill F.
Dalla Valle E.
5-76-46-4
R32
Dalla Valle E.
Navone M.[3]
7-646-3
Serdarusic N.
Roca Batalla O.
6-37-66
Geerts M.
Oradini G.
5-76-37-5
Tabur C.
Caruso S.
4-66-26-0
Erhard M.
Giustino L.
7-646-0
Sanchez Jover C.
Andaloro F.
7-636-2
Maestrelli F.
Tabacco G.
6-16-4
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-4
Zekic M.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-716-36-4
Darderi L.[7]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Debru G.
Squire H.
6-37-63
Ocleppo J.
Burruchaga R.[6]
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Luz O.
7-646-4
Echargui M.
Pellegrino A.[5]
6-36-1
Piros Z.[1]
Michalski D.
6-26-4
Gill F.
Forti F.
7-684-67-62