Tomas Machac vs Filip Peliwo — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE1
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Filip Peliwo
POL
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1211Hard ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Machac T.
6-1 6-1
Peliwo F.
Machac T.
662
Peliwo F.
110

Tomas Machac defeated Filip Peliwo 6-1 6-1 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Peliwo F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Peliwo F.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Peliwo F.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Peliwo F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
23
Break points won·Dominant
80
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Peliwo F.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
De Jong J.[5]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-4
De Jong J.[5]
Ymer E.[6]
7-676-1
Quarter-finals
Yevseyev D.
Janvier M.
6-33-67-65
Ymer E.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-06-2
Hassan B.
Copil M.
7-56-1
R16
Hassan B.
Vesely J.
4-67-657-65
Zuk K.
Durasovic V.
6-43-67-5
Kasnikowski M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-4
Copil M.
Polmans M.[4]
6-26-2
Janvier M.
Mansouri S.
6-15-76-2
Ymer E.[6]
Marie J.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Machac T.[1]
7-57-65
R32
Marie J.
Napolitano S.
3-66-47-62
De Jong J.[5]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-34-3
Zuk K.
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Ymer E.[6]
Poljak D.
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Vesely J.
Sels J.[7]
6-47-5
Copil M.
Ivanovski K.
6-41-66-4
Polmans M.[4]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-4
Mansouri S.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-646-3
Machac T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-16-1
Broom C.
Berankis R.
6-13-66-2
Yevseyev D.
Berkieta T.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Sakellaridis S.
6-26-0
Janvier M.
Bellier A.
7-616-3
Durasovic V.
De Loore J.[2]
1-67-667-64
Hassan B.
Pawelski M.
6-26-0