Jesper De Jong vs Elias Ymer — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Semi-final

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Jesper De Jong
NED5
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Elias Ymer
SWE6
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
De Jong J.
7-6 6-1
Ymer E.
De Jong J.
7962
Ymer E.
6710

Jesper De Jong defeated Elias Ymer 7-6 6-1 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

  • Match story: Jesper De Jong came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

De Jong J.Ymer E.
23
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
48
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
83
Break points won·Clear edge
37
23
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
62
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ymer E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+80 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1527
5.8Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1548
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Ymer E.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
De Jong J.[5]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-4
De Jong J.[5]
Ymer E.[6]
7-676-1
Quarter-finals
Yevseyev D.
Janvier M.
6-33-67-65
Ymer E.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-06-2
Hassan B.
Copil M.
7-56-1
R16
Hassan B.
Vesely J.
4-67-657-65
Zuk K.
Durasovic V.
6-43-67-5
Kasnikowski M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-4
Copil M.
Polmans M.[4]
6-26-2
Janvier M.
Mansouri S.
6-15-76-2
Ymer E.[6]
Marie J.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Machac T.[1]
7-57-65
R32
Marie J.
Napolitano S.
3-66-47-62
De Jong J.[5]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-34-3
Zuk K.
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Ymer E.[6]
Poljak D.
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Vesely J.
Sels J.[7]
6-47-5
Copil M.
Ivanovski K.
6-41-66-4
Polmans M.[4]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-4
Mansouri S.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-646-3
Machac T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-16-1
Broom C.
Berankis R.
6-13-66-2
Yevseyev D.
Berkieta T.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Sakellaridis S.
6-26-0
Janvier M.
Bellier A.
7-616-3
Durasovic V.
De Loore J.[2]
1-67-667-64
Hassan B.
Pawelski M.
6-26-0