Borna Gojo vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Palo Alto CH Round of 32

Palo Alto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO5
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Gojo B.
7-5 7-6
Kukushkin M.
Gojo B.
7772
Kukushkin M.
5610

Borna Gojo defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 7-5 7-6 in the Palo Alto CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
46
Break points saved·Even
95
93
Break points won·Dominant
10
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+136 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1526
6.4Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1552
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.9
Surface form
6.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Kukushkin M.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Nava E.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Nava E.
Boyer T.
2-67-646-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Watanuki Y.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.[2]
Duckworth J.[6]
6-16-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Gojo B.[5]
6-26-2
Nava E.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-627-64
Boyer T.
Mmoh M.[3]
7-57-65
R16
Watanuki Y.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-3
Gojo B.[5]
Michelsen A.
4-66-47-63
Mmoh M.[3]
Svrcina D.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Andreev A.
7-56-3
Boyer T.
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-68
Nava E.
Gaio F.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[6]
Walton A.
6-36-4
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chappell N.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-26-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Sweeny D.
2-67-667-612
Shimabukuro S.
Tirante T.[8]
6-16-3
Nava E.
Quinn E.
6-16-2
Kovacevic A.[7]
Kudla D.
6-36-2
Michelsen A.
Hong S.
4-66-26-0
Cozbinov A.
Verdasco F.
6-16-3
Walton A.
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Gojo B.[5]
Kukushkin M.
7-57-61
Svrcina D.
Jung J.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Johnson S.
7-55-76-4
Andreev A.
Banerjee S.
5-76-26-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Gaio F.
Markes C.
3-66-36-4
Boyer T.
Klahn B.
6-37-62