Marius Copil vs Kalin Ivanovski — Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH Round of 32

Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
MKD
Kalin Ivanovski
#710ATP
22 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Copil M.
6-4 1-6 6-4
Ivanovski K.
Copil M.
6162
Ivanovski K.
4641

Marius Copil defeated Kalin Ivanovski 6-4 1-6 6-4 in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ivanovski K.

Ivanovski K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Ivanovski K.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.7
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (65 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Ivanovski K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
De Jong J.[5]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Hassan B.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-4
De Jong J.[5]
Ymer E.[6]
7-676-1
Quarter-finals
Yevseyev D.
Janvier M.
6-33-67-65
Ymer E.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Kasnikowski M.
6-06-2
Hassan B.
Copil M.
7-56-1
R16
Hassan B.
Vesely J.
4-67-657-65
Zuk K.
Durasovic V.
6-43-67-5
Kasnikowski M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
De Jong J.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-4
Copil M.
Polmans M.[4]
6-26-2
Janvier M.
Mansouri S.
6-15-76-2
Ymer E.[6]
Marie J.
4-66-36-4
Yevseyev D.
Machac T.[1]
7-57-65
R32
Marie J.
Napolitano S.
3-66-47-62
De Jong J.[5]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-34-3
Zuk K.
Santillan A.
6-36-2
Ymer E.[6]
Poljak D.
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.
Blanch D.
6-26-1
Vesely J.
Sels J.[7]
6-47-5
Copil M.
Ivanovski K.
6-41-66-4
Polmans M.[4]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-36-4
Mansouri S.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
7-646-3
Machac T.[1]
Peliwo F.
6-16-1
Broom C.
Berankis R.
6-13-66-2
Yevseyev D.
Berkieta T.
6-36-1
Kasnikowski M.
Sakellaridis S.
6-26-0
Janvier M.
Bellier A.
7-616-3
Durasovic V.
De Loore J.[2]
1-67-667-64
Hassan B.
Pawelski M.
6-26-0