Arthur Cazaux vs Jack Draper — Winnipeg CH Quarter-final

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA6
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Jack Draper
GBR1
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1783Hard ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Cazaux A.
6-3 6-3
Draper J.
Cazaux A.
662
Draper J.
330

Arthur Cazaux defeated Jack Draper 6-3 6-3 in the Winnipeg CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Draper J.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Even
7.7
8.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
88
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
27
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
87
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Draper J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1738
Surface ELO
6.7+45 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
7.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cazaux A.Draper J.
Freshness·
—
100

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Peniston R.
Riedi L.
6-44-66-4
Semi-finals
Riedi L.
Broady L.[4]
6-26-3
Peniston R.
Cazaux A.[6]
6-32-67-5
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.
Bellucci M.
6-33-66-3
Broady L.[4]
Harris B.
7-656-4
Peniston R.
King D.
6-06-1
Cazaux A.[6]
Draper J.[1]
6-36-3
R16
Riedi L.
Mayot H.
W/O
Bellucci M.
Diallo G.
6-26-3
Peniston R.
Harrison C.
6-06-2
Broady L.[4]
Hsu Y.
1-66-16-1
Harris B.
Nardi L.[5]
6-45-77-5
King D.
Bonzi B.[3]
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[6]
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Draper J.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-64
R32
King D.
Schnur B.
6-26-1
Blanch U.
Martin A.
7-637-610
Broady L.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-3
Mayot H.
Kumar O.
6-12-66-4
Bellucci M.
Galarneau A.
7-6106-786-3
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
4-66-27-66
Peniston R.
Baadi T.
6-06-2
Cazaux A.[6]
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Draper J.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-26-2
Harris B.
Martin D.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rodesch C.
6-06-2
Riedi L.
Goffin D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Nardi L.[5]
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Bonzi B.[3]
Shimizu Y.
6-26-4
Harrison C.
Stricker D.[7]
7-56-1