Emilio Nava vs Tristan Boyer — Palo Alto CH Semi-final

Palo Alto CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Tristan Boyer
USA
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1525Hard ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Nava E.
2-6 7-6 6-1
Boyer T.
Nava E.
27762
Boyer T.
66411

Emilio Nava defeated Tristan Boyer 2-6 7-6 6-1 in the Palo Alto CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Boyer T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Boyer T.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Boyer T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Boyer T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
43
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
83
Break points won·Even
17
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Boyer T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+96 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1525
7.4Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1561
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Boyer T.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Boyer T.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Nava E.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Nava E.
Boyer T.
2-67-646-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Watanuki Y.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.[2]
Duckworth J.[6]
6-16-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Gojo B.[5]
6-26-2
Nava E.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-627-64
Boyer T.
Mmoh M.[3]
7-57-65
R16
Watanuki Y.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-3
Gojo B.[5]
Michelsen A.
4-66-47-63
Mmoh M.[3]
Svrcina D.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Andreev A.
7-56-3
Boyer T.
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-68
Nava E.
Gaio F.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[6]
Walton A.
6-36-4
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chappell N.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-26-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Sweeny D.
2-67-667-612
Shimabukuro S.
Tirante T.[8]
6-16-3
Nava E.
Quinn E.
6-16-2
Kovacevic A.[7]
Kudla D.
6-36-2
Michelsen A.
Hong S.
4-66-26-0
Cozbinov A.
Verdasco F.
6-16-3
Walton A.
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Gojo B.[5]
Kukushkin M.
7-57-61
Svrcina D.
Jung J.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Johnson S.
7-55-76-4
Andreev A.
Banerjee S.
5-76-26-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Gaio F.
Markes C.
3-66-36-4
Boyer T.
Klahn B.
6-37-62