Tristan Boyer vs Michael Mmoh — Palo Alto CH Quarter-final

Palo Alto CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tristan Boyer
USA
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1525Hard ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA3
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Boyer T.
7-5 7-6
Mmoh M.
Boyer T.
7772
Mmoh M.
5650

Tristan Boyer defeated Michael Mmoh 7-5 7-6 in the Palo Alto CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Mmoh came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tristan Boyer claimed a first win over Michael Mmoh in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-03DallasQ1hardMichael Mmoh6-4 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Boyer T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Boyer T.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Boyer T.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
43
66
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
91
Break points won·Slight edge
20
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Boyer T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1525
Surface ELO
6.3+74 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1561
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1613
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Boyer T.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Boyer T.: 15 days rest · Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Lestienne C.[4]
Nava E.
7-646-2
Semi-finals
Nava E.
Boyer T.
2-67-646-1
Lestienne C.[4]
Watanuki Y.[2]
W/O
Quarter-finals
Watanuki Y.[2]
Duckworth J.[6]
6-16-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Gojo B.[5]
6-26-2
Nava E.
Kovacevic A.[7]
7-627-64
Boyer T.
Mmoh M.[3]
7-57-65
R16
Watanuki Y.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-3
Gojo B.[5]
Michelsen A.
4-66-47-63
Mmoh M.[3]
Svrcina D.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.[7]
Andreev A.
7-56-3
Boyer T.
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-68
Nava E.
Gaio F.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.[4]
Cozbinov A.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[6]
Walton A.
6-36-4
R32
Moreno De Alboran N.
Chappell N.
3-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[6]
Olivieri G.
6-26-3
Lestienne C.[4]
Sweeny D.
2-67-667-612
Shimabukuro S.
Tirante T.[8]
6-16-3
Nava E.
Quinn E.
6-16-2
Kovacevic A.[7]
Kudla D.
6-36-2
Michelsen A.
Hong S.
4-66-26-0
Cozbinov A.
Verdasco F.
6-16-3
Walton A.
Svajda Z.
6-26-2
Gojo B.[5]
Kukushkin M.
7-57-61
Svrcina D.
Jung J.
6-46-2
Watanuki Y.[2]
Johnson S.
7-55-76-4
Andreev A.
Banerjee S.
5-76-26-4
Mmoh M.[3]
Krueger M.
6-26-3
Gaio F.
Markes C.
3-66-36-4
Boyer T.
Klahn B.
6-37-62