Arthur Cazaux vs Ulises Blanch — Winnipeg CH Round of 16

Winnipeg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Arthur Cazaux
FRA6
Arthur Cazaux
#78ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 August 2023
hard
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
Cazaux A.
6-3 7-5
Blanch U.
Cazaux A.
672
Blanch U.
350

Arthur Cazaux defeated Ulises Blanch 6-3 7-5 in the Winnipeg CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #78.

Key context

  • Match story: Arthur Cazaux closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Blanch U.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Blanch U.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Blanch U.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.8
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Blanch U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Dominant
27
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Blanch U.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
4.9
Fatigue & Travel
2.7
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Peniston R.
Riedi L.
6-44-66-4
Semi-finals
Riedi L.
Broady L.[4]
6-26-3
Peniston R.
Cazaux A.[6]
6-32-67-5
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.
Bellucci M.
6-33-66-3
Broady L.[4]
Harris B.
7-656-4
Peniston R.
King D.
6-06-1
Cazaux A.[6]
Draper J.[1]
6-36-3
R16
Riedi L.
Mayot H.
W/O
Bellucci M.
Diallo G.
6-26-3
Peniston R.
Harrison C.
6-06-2
Broady L.[4]
Hsu Y.
1-66-16-1
Harris B.
Nardi L.[5]
6-45-77-5
King D.
Bonzi B.[3]
6-36-1
Cazaux A.[6]
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Draper J.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-64
R32
King D.
Schnur B.
6-26-1
Blanch U.
Martin A.
7-637-610
Broady L.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-3
Mayot H.
Kumar O.
6-12-66-4
Bellucci M.
Galarneau A.
7-6106-786-3
Diallo G.
Couacaud E.
4-66-27-66
Peniston R.
Baadi T.
6-06-2
Cazaux A.[6]
Pannu K.
6-36-1
Draper J.[1]
Noguchi R.
6-26-2
Harris B.
Martin D.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Rodesch C.
6-06-2
Riedi L.
Goffin D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Nardi L.[5]
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Bonzi B.[3]
Shimizu Y.
6-26-4
Harrison C.
Stricker D.[7]
7-56-1