Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Justin Roberts — Santo Domingo CH Round of 32

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
BAH
Justin Roberts
#971ATP
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLW
Reis Da Silva J.
6-4 6-4
Roberts J.
Reis Da Silva J.
662
Roberts J.
440

Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva defeated Justin Roberts 6-4 6-4 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reis Da Silva J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Roberts J.

Roberts J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reis Da Silva J.Roberts J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Reis Da Silva J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Roberts J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Olivieri G.[7]
Trungelliti M.[8]
7-52-66-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[8]
Comesana F.
7-56-3
Olivieri G.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-40-0
Trungelliti M.[8]
Tabilo A.[2]
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Tomic B.
6-726-26-3
Olivieri G.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
R16
Tabilo A.[2]
Lama G.
6-36-0
Olivieri G.[7]
Monzon I.
6-46-0
Tomic B.
Reis Da Silva J.
5-76-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Bertran P.
6-16-3
Comesana F.
Tirante T.[3]
6-16-757-5
Dellien Velasco M.
Alves M.
4-66-36-4
Trungelliti M.[8]
Bueno G.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
6-41-66-4
R32
Lama G.
Verdasco F.
6-13-66-3
Comesana F.
Oliveira G.
6-46-0
Olivieri G.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-21-66-2
Tomic B.
Dellien H.[5]
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-1
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Ribeiro E.
6-47-68
Monzon I.
Uchida K.
6-46-736-4
Alves M.
Cid R.
7-56-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-46-1
Coria F.[1]
Panta Herreros J.
6-06-3
Bertran P.
Hardt N.
6-35-76-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Roberts J.
6-46-4
Tabilo A.[2]
Seelig K.
7-56-3
Ficovich J.
Sakamoto P.
6-40-66-2
Tirante T.[3]
Heide G.
7-646-4
Bueno G.
Sheehy J.
7-666-3