Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Leandro Riedi — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
PAR
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
#71ATP
1740ELO
1520Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$653kCAREER
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
hard
Leandro Riedi
SUI8
Leandro Riedi
#134ATP
1693ELO
1675Hard ELO
$193kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWWLLWW
Vallejo A.
6-3 6-4
Riedi L.
Vallejo A.
662
Riedi L.
340

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo defeated Leandro Riedi 6-3 6-4 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Adolfo Daniel Vallejo came in ranked #71.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vallejo A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Riedi L.

Riedi L.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Vallejo A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vallejo A.Riedi L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (174 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vallejo A.Riedi L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
63
Break points saved·Clear edge
71
94
Break points won·Dominant
65
14
Deciding sets·Even
85
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vallejo A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Riedi L.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
2.9Hard Elo 1520
Surface ELO
7.1+156 Hard Elo edge
5.3Overall Elo 1740
ELO gap
4.7Overall Elo 1693
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
5.9
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vallejo A.Riedi L.
Freshness·
86
—

Vallejo A.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
6-43-67-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Hijikata R.[1]
7-634-66-1
Semi-finals
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Kypson P.
6-7106-36-1
Walton A.
Broady L.[3]
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Walton A.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Wu T.
6-37-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Broady L.[3]
Harris L.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-646-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Samuel T.
7-55-76-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
R16
Hijikata R.[2]
Ritschard A.
7-646-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-65
Broady L.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-3
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[6]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Vallejo A.
6-13-66-1
Walton A.
Harris B.
3-67-677-63
Harris L.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-54-1
Samuel T.
Marchenko I.
7-56-766-1
Kypson P.
Walton A.[4]
7-56-3
Michelsen A.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Andreozzi G.[7]
Harrison C.
6-17-63
Vives Marcos P.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[1]
Langmo C.
6-44-66-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Johns G.
6-36-3
R32
Hijikata R.[2]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[6]
Quinn E.
6-726-36-1
Cazaux A.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Broady L.[3]
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Ritschard A.
Fratangelo B.
6-34-66-2
Walton A.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gomez E.[7]
7-57-65
Ellis B.
Sandgren T.
6-31-66-3
Peniston R.
Poling K.
6-21-67-5
Dostanic S.
Svajda Z.
7-656-3
Vallejo A.
Riedi L.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mochizuki Y.
4-66-36-2
Hong S.
Shevchenko A.[1]
3-66-37-64
Vives Marcos P.
Ejupovic E.
6-24-66-2
Johns G.
Blanch D.
6-23-67-62
Samuel T.
Schnur B.
6-36-756-3
Kirchheimer S.
Schoolkate T.
6-756-37-63
Andreozzi G.[7]
Angele J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.[8]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Kingsley C.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Young D.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Harrison C.
Mayo A.
4-66-46-2
Marchenko I.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-47-62
Michelsen A.[2]
Janvier M.
5-77-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Jansen W.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-24-66-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Rodenas P.
6-36-1