Gonzalo Lama vs Fernando Verdasco — Santo Domingo CH Round of 32

Santo Domingo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
ESP
Fernando Verdasco
42 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLLL
Lama G.
6-1 3-6 6-3
Verdasco F.
Lama G.
6362
Verdasco F.
1631

Gonzalo Lama defeated Fernando Verdasco 6-1 3-6 6-3 in the Santo Domingo CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Gonzalo Lama came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Gonzalo Lama closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lama G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Verdasco F.

Verdasco F.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Serve advantage — Lama G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lama G.Verdasco F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lama G.Verdasco F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
35
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
96
Break points won·Dominant
0
40
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lama G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Verdasco F.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
1.6
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
6.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Olivieri G.[7]
Trungelliti M.[8]
7-52-66-4
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.[8]
Comesana F.
7-56-3
Olivieri G.[7]
Coria F.[1]
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Comesana F.
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
6-40-0
Trungelliti M.[8]
Tabilo A.[2]
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Tomic B.
6-726-26-3
Olivieri G.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
R16
Tabilo A.[2]
Lama G.
6-36-0
Olivieri G.[7]
Monzon I.
6-46-0
Tomic B.
Reis Da Silva J.
5-76-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Bertran P.
6-16-3
Comesana F.
Tirante T.[3]
6-16-757-5
Dellien Velasco M.
Alves M.
4-66-36-4
Trungelliti M.[8]
Bueno G.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
6-41-66-4
R32
Lama G.
Verdasco F.
6-13-66-3
Comesana F.
Oliveira G.
6-46-0
Olivieri G.[7]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-21-66-2
Tomic B.
Dellien H.[5]
6-36-2
Trungelliti M.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-46-1
Meligeni Alves F.[6]
Ribeiro E.
6-47-68
Monzon I.
Uchida K.
6-46-736-4
Alves M.
Cid R.
7-56-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Cobolli F.[4]
6-46-1
Coria F.[1]
Panta Herreros J.
6-06-3
Bertran P.
Hardt N.
6-35-76-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Roberts J.
6-46-4
Tabilo A.[2]
Seelig K.
7-56-3
Ficovich J.
Sakamoto P.
6-40-66-2
Tirante T.[3]
Heide G.
7-646-4
Bueno G.
Sheehy J.
7-666-3