Martin Krumich vs Hazem Naw — Meerbusch CH Qualifying Round 1

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
CZE
Martin Krumich
#278ATP
1459ELO
1423Clay ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
SYR9
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Krumich M.
6-4 6-2
Naw H.
Krumich M.
662
Naw H.
420

Martin Krumich defeated Hazem Naw 6-4 6-2 in the Meerbusch CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krumich M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Naw H.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Krumich M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krumich M.Naw H.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krumich M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Naw H.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krumich M.Naw H.
Freshness·
67
—

Krumich M.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Luz O.[4]
Nam J.[11]
4-66-46-4
Gill F.[6]
Damas M.[8]
6-31-66-3
Den Ouden G.
Kravchenko G.
6-26-3
Kirkin E.[1]
Sperle J.
7-626-3
Colson T.
Gentzsch T.
6-16-4
Krumich M.
Sakellaridis S.[2]
6-37-5
Q1
Den Ouden G.
Gavrielides L.
4-66-36-3
Luz O.[4]
Koch N.
6-26-0
Gill F.[6]
Vives Marcos P.
7-667-64
Kravchenko G.
Wehnelt K.[12]
6-47-66
Sperle J.
Compagnucci T.[7]
6-24-66-4
Kirkin E.[1]
Zormann Da Silva M.
6-36-1
Damas M.[8]
Forejtek J.
6-04-66-3
Gentzsch T.
Mora M.[10]
5-76-46-1
Krumich M.
Naw H.[9]
6-46-2
Sakellaridis S.[2]
Salazar Martinez D.
7-646-4
Nam J.[11]
Williams A.
6-46-746-1
Colson T.
Oetzbach A.
7-637-64