Benjamin Hassan vs Sumit Nagal — Meerbusch CH Round of 16

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Benjamin Hassan
LBN
Benjamin Hassan
#463ATP
1451ELO
1452Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND3
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Hassan B.
6-2 6-2
Nagal S.
Hassan B.
662
Nagal S.
220

Benjamin Hassan defeated Sumit Nagal 6-2 6-2 in the Meerbusch CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #241, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hassan B.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Hassan B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hassan B.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hassan B.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
33
Break points saved·Even
68
69
Break points won·Clear edge
17
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
62
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hassan B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Nagal S.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1452
Surface ELO
5.6+85 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1451
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1543
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
6.7
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hassan B.Nagal S.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Hassan B.: 20 days rest · Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Guinard M.
7-656-0
Choinski J.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[6]
2-67-56-3
Droguet T.[4]
Rehberg M.
7-666-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Hassan B.
7-621-66-2
Guinard M.
Rincon D.
7-606-1
R16
Droguet T.[4]
Yevseyev D.
6-16-3
Rehberg M.
Onclin G.[8]
7-647-64
Hassan B.
Nagal S.[3]
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Feldbausch K.
6-26-1
Choinski J.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-707-65
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Kirkin E.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Guinard M.
Squire H.
6-46-4
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Colson T.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Laaksonen H.
7-636-1
Kirkin E.
Molleker R.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Yevseyev D.
Krumich M.
6-737-56-4
Rincon D.
Gill F.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-46-2
Onclin G.[8]
Campana Lee G.
2-67-56-1
Nagal S.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-3
Feldbausch K.
Houkes M.
7-56-4
Geerts M.
Moeller M.
7-56-736-4
Rehberg M.
Michalski D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Luz O.
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[2]
Kuhn N.
7-646-4
Squire H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-46-2