Benjamin Hassan vs Henri Laaksonen — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Benjamin Hassan
LBN
Benjamin Hassan
#463ATP
1451ELO
1452Clay ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
SUI
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Hassan B.
7-6 6-1
Laaksonen H.
Hassan B.
7762
Laaksonen H.
6310

Benjamin Hassan defeated Henri Laaksonen 7-6 6-1 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Benjamin Hassan came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Benjamin Hassan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Benjamin Hassan came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-05-16GenevaQ1clayBenjamin Hassan6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Hassan B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Hassan B.

Serve advantage — Hassan B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hassan B.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Even
55%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hassan B.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
84
Break points won·Even
17
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
62
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hassan B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Laaksonen H.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.9
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hassan B.Laaksonen H.
Freshness·
100
—

Hassan B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Guinard M.
7-656-0
Choinski J.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[6]
2-67-56-3
Droguet T.[4]
Rehberg M.
7-666-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Hassan B.
7-621-66-2
Guinard M.
Rincon D.
7-606-1
R16
Droguet T.[4]
Yevseyev D.
6-16-3
Rehberg M.
Onclin G.[8]
7-647-64
Hassan B.
Nagal S.[3]
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Feldbausch K.
6-26-1
Choinski J.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-707-65
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Kirkin E.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Guinard M.
Squire H.
6-46-4
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Colson T.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Laaksonen H.
7-636-1
Kirkin E.
Molleker R.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Yevseyev D.
Krumich M.
6-737-56-4
Rincon D.
Gill F.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-46-2
Onclin G.[8]
Campana Lee G.
2-67-56-1
Nagal S.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-3
Feldbausch K.
Houkes M.
7-56-4
Geerts M.
Moeller M.
7-56-736-4
Rehberg M.
Michalski D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Luz O.
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[2]
Kuhn N.
7-646-4
Squire H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-46-2