Nino Serdarusic vs Nerman Fatic — Banja Luka CH Round of 32

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Serdarusic N.
6-3 0-0
Fatic N.
Serdarusic N.
60–
Fatic N.
30–

Nino Serdarusic advanced when Nerman Fatic retired 6-3 0-0 in the Banja Luka CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Serdarusic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Serdarusic N.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Serdarusic N.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
24
Break points saved·Even
66
63
Break points won·Dominant
5
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
10
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Serdarusic N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fatic N.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.5
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Marozsan F.[1]
W/O
Coppejans K.[5]
Topo M.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[5]
Gombos N.
3-5
Topo M.
Kodat T.
6-36-3
Prizmic D.
Dzumhur D.[8]
6-36-4
Marozsan F.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-0
R16
Gombos N.
Paire B.[4]
6-46-2
Kodat T.
Vanshelboim E.
7-56-1
Barranco Cosano J.
Navone M.[6]
6-27-65
Marozsan F.[1]
Tabur C.
6-36-2
Topo M.
Madaras D.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-776-37-5
Dzumhur D.[8]
Ajdukovic D.
6-27-5
Prizmic D.
Molcan A.[3]
6-16-4
R32
Molcan A.[3]
Zekic M.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-06-2
Serdarusic N.
Fatic N.
6-30-0
Paire B.[4]
Setkic A.
6-27-5
Coppejans K.[5]
Basic M.
6-36-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Polmans M.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.
Santillan A.
2-66-35-3
Tabur C.
Ivanovski K.
7-647-63
Gombos N.
Jianu F.
7-606-2
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-5
Kodat T.
Blanchet U.
6-46-3
Vanshelboim E.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Nedic A.
5-77-646-3
Navone M.[6]
Jacquet K.
3-66-36-3
Madaras D.
Cecchinato M.[2]
6-26-1
Marozsan F.[1]
Durasovic V.
3-66-06-3