Blake Ellis vs Tennys Sandgren — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Ellis B.
6-3 1-6 6-3
Sandgren T.
Ellis B.
6162
Sandgren T.
3631

Blake Ellis defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-3 1-6 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Blake Ellis closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ellis B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ellis B.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
9.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ellis B.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
92
Break points won·Even
3
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
38
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ellis B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sandgren T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.4
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
6.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ellis B.Sandgren T.
Freshness·
90
—

Ellis B.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
6-43-67-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Hijikata R.[1]
7-634-66-1
Semi-finals
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Kypson P.
6-7106-36-1
Walton A.
Broady L.[3]
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Walton A.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Wu T.
6-37-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Broady L.[3]
Harris L.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-646-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Samuel T.
7-55-76-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
R16
Hijikata R.[2]
Ritschard A.
7-646-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-65
Broady L.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-3
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[6]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Vallejo A.
6-13-66-1
Walton A.
Harris B.
3-67-677-63
Harris L.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-54-1
Samuel T.
Marchenko I.
7-56-766-1
Kypson P.
Walton A.[4]
7-56-3
Michelsen A.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Andreozzi G.[7]
Harrison C.
6-17-63
Vives Marcos P.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[1]
Langmo C.
6-44-66-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Johns G.
6-36-3
R32
Hijikata R.[2]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[6]
Quinn E.
6-726-36-1
Cazaux A.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Broady L.[3]
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Ritschard A.
Fratangelo B.
6-34-66-2
Walton A.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gomez E.[7]
7-57-65
Ellis B.
Sandgren T.
6-31-66-3
Peniston R.
Poling K.
6-21-67-5
Dostanic S.
Svajda Z.
7-656-3
Vallejo A.
Riedi L.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mochizuki Y.
4-66-36-2
Hong S.
Shevchenko A.[1]
3-66-37-64
Vives Marcos P.
Ejupovic E.
6-24-66-2
Johns G.
Blanch D.
6-23-67-62
Samuel T.
Schnur B.
6-36-756-3
Kirchheimer S.
Schoolkate T.
6-756-37-63
Andreozzi G.[7]
Angele J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.[8]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Kingsley C.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Young D.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Harrison C.
Mayo A.
4-66-46-2
Marchenko I.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-47-62
Michelsen A.[2]
Janvier M.
5-77-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Jansen W.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-24-66-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Rodenas P.
6-36-1