Titouan Droguet vs Max Hans Rehberg — Meerbusch CH Quarter-final

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Titouan Droguet
FRA4
Titouan Droguet
#119ATP
1717ELO
1681Clay ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
GER
Max Hans Rehberg
#409ATP
1474ELO
1398Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Droguet T.
7-6 6-4
Rehberg M.
Droguet T.
7862
Rehberg M.
6640

Titouan Droguet defeated Max Hans Rehberg 7-6 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Titouan Droguet came in ranked #119.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Droguet T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rehberg M.

Rehberg M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Serve advantage — Droguet T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Droguet T.Rehberg M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Droguet T.Rehberg M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
82
Break points won·Clear edge
17
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Droguet T.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Rehberg M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+283 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Clay Elo 1398
7.7Overall Elo 1717
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1474
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.2
Surface form
2.5
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Droguet T.Rehberg M.
Freshness·Slight edge
65
75

Droguet T.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 100 games (7d) · Rehberg M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 49 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Guinard M.
7-656-0
Choinski J.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[6]
2-67-56-3
Droguet T.[4]
Rehberg M.
7-666-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Hassan B.
7-621-66-2
Guinard M.
Rincon D.
7-606-1
R16
Droguet T.[4]
Yevseyev D.
6-16-3
Rehberg M.
Onclin G.[8]
7-647-64
Hassan B.
Nagal S.[3]
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Feldbausch K.
6-26-1
Choinski J.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-707-65
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Kirkin E.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Guinard M.
Squire H.
6-46-4
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Colson T.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Laaksonen H.
7-636-1
Kirkin E.
Molleker R.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Yevseyev D.
Krumich M.
6-737-56-4
Rincon D.
Gill F.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-46-2
Onclin G.[8]
Campana Lee G.
2-67-56-1
Nagal S.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-3
Feldbausch K.
Houkes M.
7-56-4
Geerts M.
Moeller M.
7-56-736-4
Rehberg M.
Michalski D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Luz O.
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[2]
Kuhn N.
7-646-4
Squire H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-46-2