Kimmer Coppejans vs Marko Topo — Banja Luka CH Semi-final

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL5
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1399Clay ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
Coppejans K.
6-0 6-1
Topo M.
Coppejans K.
662
Topo M.
010

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Marko Topo 6-0 6-1 in the Banja Luka CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Kimmer Coppejans came in ranked #199, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Topo M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Topo M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Even
3.9
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Topo M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
87
Break points won·Dominant
29
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
43
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Topo M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+115 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1399
5.5Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1463
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.5
Surface form
2.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Topo M.
Freshness·Even
72
75

Coppejans K.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Topo M.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Marozsan F.[1]
W/O
Coppejans K.[5]
Topo M.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[5]
Gombos N.
3-5
Topo M.
Kodat T.
6-36-3
Prizmic D.
Dzumhur D.[8]
6-36-4
Marozsan F.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-0
R16
Gombos N.
Paire B.[4]
6-46-2
Kodat T.
Vanshelboim E.
7-56-1
Barranco Cosano J.
Navone M.[6]
6-27-65
Marozsan F.[1]
Tabur C.
6-36-2
Topo M.
Madaras D.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-776-37-5
Dzumhur D.[8]
Ajdukovic D.
6-27-5
Prizmic D.
Molcan A.[3]
6-16-4
R32
Molcan A.[3]
Zekic M.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-06-2
Serdarusic N.
Fatic N.
6-30-0
Paire B.[4]
Setkic A.
6-27-5
Coppejans K.[5]
Basic M.
6-36-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Polmans M.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.
Santillan A.
2-66-35-3
Tabur C.
Ivanovski K.
7-647-63
Gombos N.
Jianu F.
7-606-2
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-5
Kodat T.
Blanchet U.
6-46-3
Vanshelboim E.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Nedic A.
5-77-646-3
Navone M.[6]
Jacquet K.
3-66-36-3
Madaras D.
Cecchinato M.[2]
6-26-1
Marozsan F.[1]
Durasovic V.
3-66-06-3