Kimmer Coppejans vs Norbert Gombos — Banja Luka CH Quarter-final

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL5
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Coppejans K.
3-5
Gombos N.
Coppejans K.
3–
Gombos N.
5–

Kimmer Coppejans advanced when Norbert Gombos retired 3-5 in the Banja Luka CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
83
Break points won·Clear edge
29
8
Deciding sets·Even
74
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gombos N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+58 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1455
5.6Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1472
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.5
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Gombos N.
Freshness·Even
76
79

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Prizmic D.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Prizmic D.
Marozsan F.[1]
W/O
Coppejans K.[5]
Topo M.
6-06-1
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[5]
Gombos N.
3-5
Topo M.
Kodat T.
6-36-3
Prizmic D.
Dzumhur D.[8]
6-36-4
Marozsan F.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-0
R16
Gombos N.
Paire B.[4]
6-46-2
Kodat T.
Vanshelboim E.
7-56-1
Barranco Cosano J.
Navone M.[6]
6-27-65
Marozsan F.[1]
Tabur C.
6-36-2
Topo M.
Madaras D.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[5]
Serdarusic N.
6-776-37-5
Dzumhur D.[8]
Ajdukovic D.
6-27-5
Prizmic D.
Molcan A.[3]
6-16-4
R32
Molcan A.[3]
Zekic M.
6-16-2
Topo M.
Blancaneaux G.
6-06-2
Serdarusic N.
Fatic N.
6-30-0
Paire B.[4]
Setkic A.
6-27-5
Coppejans K.[5]
Basic M.
6-36-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Polmans M.
6-36-1
Prizmic D.
Santillan A.
2-66-35-3
Tabur C.
Ivanovski K.
7-647-63
Gombos N.
Jianu F.
7-606-2
Ajdukovic D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-5
Kodat T.
Blanchet U.
6-46-3
Vanshelboim E.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-46-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Nedic A.
5-77-646-3
Navone M.[6]
Jacquet K.
3-66-36-3
Madaras D.
Cecchinato M.[2]
6-26-1
Marozsan F.[1]
Durasovic V.
3-66-06-3