Lloyd Harris vs Arthur Cazaux — Cary CH Round of 16

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
hard
Arthur Cazaux
FRA5
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Harris L.
6-4 7-6
Cazaux A.
Harris L.
6772
Cazaux A.
4640

Lloyd Harris defeated Arthur Cazaux 6-4 7-6 in the Cary CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris L.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Cazaux A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Harris L.Cazaux A.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Harris L.Cazaux A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.5
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris L.Cazaux A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
65
Break points saved·Even
95
97
Break points won·Even
24
27
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris L.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Cazaux A.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1640
Surface ELO
6.1+97 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1793
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
7.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
3.1
4.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
6-43-67-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Hijikata R.[1]
7-634-66-1
Semi-finals
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Kypson P.
6-7106-36-1
Walton A.
Broady L.[3]
6-47-5
Svajda Z.[8]
Michelsen A.[2]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Kypson P.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Walton A.
Hijikata R.[2]
6-26-4
Kypson P.
Wu T.
6-37-64
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Peniston R.
6-36-4
Broady L.[3]
Harris L.
6-36-4
Kypson P.
Sandgren T.[6]
7-646-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Samuel T.
7-55-76-1
Michelsen A.[2]
Andreozzi G.[7]
6-37-5
Hijikata R.[1]
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
R16
Hijikata R.[2]
Ritschard A.
7-646-3
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-65
Broady L.[3]
Ellis B.
6-36-3
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[6]
5-77-56-2
Kypson P.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Wu T.
Vallejo A.
6-13-66-1
Walton A.
Harris B.
3-67-677-63
Harris L.
Cazaux A.[5]
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-54-1
Samuel T.
Marchenko I.
7-56-766-1
Kypson P.
Walton A.[4]
7-56-3
Michelsen A.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-1
Andreozzi G.[7]
Harrison C.
6-17-63
Vives Marcos P.
Tomic B.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.[1]
Langmo C.
6-44-66-3
Svajda Z.[8]
Johns G.
6-36-3
R32
Hijikata R.[2]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Smith K.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[6]
Quinn E.
6-726-36-1
Cazaux A.[5]
Shelbayh A.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[4]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Broady L.[3]
Spizzirri E.
6-26-2
Harris L.
Mochizuki S.
6-746-36-2
Ritschard A.
Fratangelo B.
6-34-66-2
Walton A.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-3
Harris B.
Gomez E.[7]
7-57-65
Ellis B.
Sandgren T.
6-31-66-3
Peniston R.
Poling K.
6-21-67-5
Dostanic S.
Svajda Z.
7-656-3
Vallejo A.
Riedi L.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mochizuki Y.
4-66-36-2
Hong S.
Shevchenko A.[1]
3-66-37-64
Vives Marcos P.
Ejupovic E.
6-24-66-2
Johns G.
Blanch D.
6-23-67-62
Samuel T.
Schnur B.
6-36-756-3
Kirchheimer S.
Schoolkate T.
6-756-37-63
Andreozzi G.[7]
Angele J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.[8]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-4
Walton A.[4]
Krueger M.
7-56-2
Tomic B.
Kingsley C.
7-56-3
Langmo C.
Young D.
7-56-4
Kypson P.
Geerts M.
6-16-3
Harrison C.
Mayo A.
4-66-46-2
Marchenko I.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-47-62
Michelsen A.[2]
Janvier M.
5-77-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Jansen W.
6-46-3
Sandgren T.[6]
Ficovich J.
6-24-66-3
Hijikata R.[1]
Rodenas P.
6-36-1