Matteo Gigante vs Hernan Casanova — Cordenons CH Quarter-final

Cordenons CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1598Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Gigante M.
6-1 7-6
Casanova H.
Gigante M.
6772
Casanova H.
1620

Matteo Gigante defeated Hernan Casanova 6-1 7-6 in the Cordenons CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Gigante came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Casanova H.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Casanova H.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
76%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 115). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Casanova H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
8
Break points saved·Dominant
78
24
Break points won·Clear edge
35
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
32
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Casanova H.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+217 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1381
7.4Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1393
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gigante M.Casanova H.
Freshness·
—
70

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Gigante M.
Neumayer L.
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Neumayer L.
Bonadio R.[3]
6-27-613
Gigante M.
Dalla Valle E.
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Bonadio R.[3]
Sanchez Jover C.
7-56-3
Neumayer L.
Martineau M.
1-66-46-0
Gigante M.
Casanova H.
6-17-62
Dalla Valle E.
Gomez F.
6-36-1
R16
Casanova H.
Iannaccone F.
6-26-3
Gomez F.
Lavagno E.[7]
4-66-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Passaro F.[2]
6-16-736-1
Sanchez Jover C.
Ionel N.[5]
1-66-06-2
Neumayer L.
Rottoli L.
6-16-4
Martineau M.
Chazal M.
6-16-3
Bonadio R.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Gigante M.
Rola B.
7-56-2
R32
Lavagno E.[7]
Arnaboldi F.
6-04-1
Iannaccone F.
Collarini A.[6]
6-22-0
Gomez F.
Villanueva G.
2-66-37-62
Maestrelli F.
Forti F.
6-26-4
Passaro F.[2]
Vrbensky M.
6-26-0
Ionel N.[5]
Fonio G.
6-35-77-5
Bonadio R.[3]
Vacherot V.
7-56-4
Chazal M.
Tseng C.
2-66-36-4
Rottoli L.
Burruchaga R.[8]
5-76-36-3
Neumayer L.
Ferrari G.
6-46-2
Martineau M.
Novak D.[1]
6-26-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Tabacco F.
6-15-76-4
Casanova H.
Otegui J.
6-46-4
Rola B.
Taberner C.
2-66-16-4
Gigante M.
Orlov V.
6-756-46-4
Dalla Valle E.
Lopez San Martin A.
6-26-4