Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Manuel Guinard — Meerbusch CH Semi-final

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG5
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 August 2023
clay
FRA
Manuel Guinard
#1565ATP
30 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-6 6-0
Guinard M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7762
Guinard M.
6500

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Manuel Guinard 7-6 6-0 in the Meerbusch CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #58.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Guinard M.

Guinard M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Guinard M.
24
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Guinard M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Guinard M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
80
Break points won·Dominant
62
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ugo Carabelli C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Guinard M.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Guinard M.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.[2]
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Guinard M.
7-656-0
Choinski J.[2]
Droguet T.[4]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[2]
Kuzmanov D.[6]
2-67-56-3
Droguet T.[4]
Rehberg M.
7-666-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Hassan B.
7-621-66-2
Guinard M.
Rincon D.
7-606-1
R16
Droguet T.[4]
Yevseyev D.
6-16-3
Rehberg M.
Onclin G.[8]
7-647-64
Hassan B.
Nagal S.[3]
6-26-2
Rincon D.
Feldbausch K.
6-26-1
Choinski J.[2]
Wessels L.
6-26-707-65
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Kirkin E.
6-16-4
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Geerts M.
7-56-3
Guinard M.
Squire H.
6-46-4
R32
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Colson T.
6-26-2
Hassan B.
Laaksonen H.
7-636-1
Kirkin E.
Molleker R.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.[6]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Yevseyev D.
Krumich M.
6-737-56-4
Rincon D.
Gill F.
6-46-2
Droguet T.[4]
Den Ouden G.
6-46-2
Onclin G.[8]
Campana Lee G.
2-67-56-1
Nagal S.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-3
Feldbausch K.
Houkes M.
7-56-4
Geerts M.
Moeller M.
7-56-736-4
Rehberg M.
Michalski D.
2-66-16-4
Wessels L.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Guinard M.
Luz O.
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[2]
Kuhn N.
7-646-4
Squire H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-46-2