Alexander Weis vs Valentin Vacherot — San Marino CH Round of 16

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
Valentin Vacherot
MON
Valentin Vacherot
#21ATP
1903ELO
1789Clay ELO
$1.0MYTD
$3.5MCAREER
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWWWLWW
Weis A.
6-4 3-6 7-6
Vacherot V.
Weis A.
63772
Vacherot V.
46631

Alexander Weis defeated Valentin Vacherot 6-4 3-6 7-6 in the San Marino CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Valentin Vacherot came in ranked #21, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Alexander Weis closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Weis A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vacherot V.

Vacherot V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Serve advantage — Vacherot V.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Weis A.Vacherot V.
—
Serve
39
—
Return
54

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Weis A.Vacherot V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weis A.Vacherot V.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
69
Break points saved·Dominant
50
96
Break points won·Clear edge
13
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Weis A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Vacherot V.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
2.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Pellegrino A.
Fatic N.
3-66-30-0
Munar J.[2]
Rincon D.
0-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-47-5
Pellegrino A.
Weis A.
7-637-63
Rincon D.
Fognini F.[4]
6-746-46-4
Fatic N.
Goffin D.[3]
6-26-3
R16
Munar J.[2]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-2
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-36-2
Fognini F.[4]
Lavagno E.
6-37-5
Delbonis F.
Giannessi A.
6-35-76-1
Fatic N.
Jacquet K.
7-56-4
Goffin D.[3]
Sachko V.
6-706-26-2
Weis A.
Vacherot V.
6-43-67-63
Pellegrino A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-41-66-1
R32
Munar J.[2]
Passaro F.
6-46-4
Rincon D.
Serafini M.
7-657-64
Weis A.
Mager G.
7-51-1
Pellegrino A.
Dougaz A.
6-34-1
Sachko V.
Ionel N.
6-42-66-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Taberner C.
2-66-27-5
Giannessi A.
Echargui M.
1-66-46-4
Delbonis F.
Polmans M.[8]
6-16-3
Fognini F.[4]
Collarini A.
6-06-1
Lavagno E.
De Rossi M.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Madaras D.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Cobolli F.[5]
6-34-66-1
Fatic N.
Burruchaga R.
6-33-66-3
Goffin D.[3]
Gaio F.
6-27-5
Vacherot V.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-26-3
Dalla Valle E.
Muller A.[1]
6-36-4