Albert Ramos vs Juan Pablo Varillas — Kitzbuhel Round of 32

Kitzbuhel · ATP · Round of 32
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
Juan Pablo Varillas
PER
Juan Pablo Varillas
#279ATP
1440ELO
1431Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLL
Ramos A.
6-1 7-5
Varillas J.
Ramos A.
672
Varillas J.
150

Albert Ramos defeated Juan Pablo Varillas 6-1 7-5 in the Kitzbuhel round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's semi-final. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 6–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

5–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-02-19Rio de JaneiroR32clayAlbert Ramos3-6 6-3 7-5
2023-07-17GstaadQFclayAlbert Ramos6-7(2) 6-1 6-4
2023-05-22LyonR32clayJuan Pablo Varillas3-6 7-6(7) 6-4
2022-07-25KitzbuhelR16clayAlbert Ramos6-3 6-4
2022-01-31CordobaR16clayAlbert Ramos6-4 2-3 RET
2020-02-24SantiagoR16clayAlbert Ramos7-6(3) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Varillas J.

Varillas J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Varillas J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Varillas J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Varillas J.
Clutch Rating·Even
59
55
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
80
Break points won·Slight edge
49
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Varillas J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+95 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Clay Elo 1431
6.0Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
4.0Overall Elo 1440
7.3
H2H
2.7
6.3
Surface form
6.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
0.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
5.4
Country comfort
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ramos A.Varillas J.
Freshness·
—
55

Varillas J.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Baez S.
Thiem D.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Baez S.
Etcheverry T.[1]
7-653-66-4
Thiem D.
Djere L.[5]
6-737-57-68
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[1]
Galan D.
6-766-36-4
Baez S.
Molcan A.
6-46-3
Djere L.[5]
Cachin P.[3]
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Rinderknech A.
4-66-36-4
R16
Galan D.
Altmaier D.[8]
3-66-27-68
Rinderknech A.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
7-636-3
Molcan A.
Ofner S.[4]
4-67-57-65
Baez S.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-16-2
Djere L.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-656-3
Cachin P.[3]
Ramos A.
7-56-3
Thiem D.
Zhang Z.
1-66-36-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-26-2
R32
Thiem D.
Bagnis F.
7-637-66
Zhang Z.
Lajovic D.[7]
6-36-2
Andreozzi G.
Misolic F.
5-76-46-2
Galan D.
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Huesler M.
6-756-26-4
Molcan A.
Van Assche L.
6-46-3
Baez S.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-2
Djere L.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.
Cerundolo J.
6-736-46-2
Ramos A.
Varillas J.
6-17-5
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Pella G.
6-26-4