Sumit Nagal vs Andrew Paulson — Liberec CH Round of 32

Liberec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND4
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
Andrew Paulson
CZE
Andrew Paulson
#602ATP
1452ELO
1427Clay ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Nagal S.
6-0 7-6
Paulson A.
Nagal S.
6772
Paulson A.
0650

Sumit Nagal defeated Andrew Paulson 6-0 7-6 in the Liberec CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #219, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Paulson A.

Paulson A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Paulson A.
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Paulson A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
2
Break points saved·Dominant
69
40
Break points won·Dominant
35
3
Deciding sets·Even
16
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Paulson A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.7+111 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Clay Elo 1427
5.4Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1452
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
2.5
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Paulson A.
Freshness·
95
—

Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Comesana F.[8]
Kodat T.
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Comesana F.[8]
Blanchet U.
6-36-0
Kodat T.
Campana Lee G.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Campana Lee G.
Casanova H.
6-36-756-4
Comesana F.[8]
Prizmic D.
3-67-56-2
Kodat T.
Gomez F.
6-16-0
Blanchet U.
Svrcina D.[3]
6-06-3
R16
Kodat T.
Gombos N.[6]
6-46-3
Campana Lee G.
Machac T.[1]
7-50-0
Svrcina D.[3]
Michalski D.
7-54-66-3
Blanchet U.
Kopriva V.
3-66-46-2
Casanova H.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-47-65
Gomez F.
Nagal S.[4]
6-46-2
Comesana F.[8]
Vrbensky M.
7-56-4
Prizmic D.
Klein L.[2]
6-27-66
R32
Vrbensky M.
Royer V.
6-42-66-4
Kopriva V.
Mensik J.[7]
6-31-0
Kodat T.
Stodder T.
3-66-36-3
Casanova H.
Zekic M.
6-36-4
Nagal S.[4]
Paulson A.
6-07-65
Comesana F.[8]
Bittoun Kouzmine C.
6-16-3
Gombos N.[6]
Fonio G.
7-656-4
Blanchet U.
Barton H.
6-16-3
Campana Lee G.
Serdarusic N.
6-43-66-4
Prizmic D.
Kivattsev K.
7-56-4
Klein L.[2]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-2
Gomez F.
Vesely J.
4-66-36-4
Machac T.[1]
Marti Pujolras A.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
3-67-606-3
Michalski D.
Houkes M.
7-56-4
Bonadio R.[5]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-1