Aidan Mayo vs Nathan Ponwith — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Aidan Mayo
#674ATP
1380ELO
1359Hard ELO
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
USA
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Mayo A.
6-4 6-1
Ponwith N.
Mayo A.
662
Ponwith N.
410

Aidan Mayo defeated Nathan Ponwith 6-4 6-1 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mayo A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mayo A.

Serve advantage — Mayo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayo A.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayo A.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ponwith N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
1.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
6.7
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayo A.Ponwith N.
Freshness·
93
—

Mayo A.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Kingsley C.
6-27-66
Johnson S.[2]
Sandgren T.[5]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mayo A.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[5]
Hong S.[4]
6-46-2
Kingsley C.
Wu T.[3]
6-36-2
Johnson S.[2]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.[3]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Schoolkate T.[8]
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Hong S.[4]
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.[5]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Walton A.[7]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5
R32
Kirchheimer S.
Damm M.
6-747-657-64
Sweeny D.[6]
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Spizzirri E.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Blanch U.
Mchugh A.
7-626-4
Walton A.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Lapadat J.
7-56-3
Vallejo A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-1
Wu T.[3]
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Ponwith N.
6-46-1
Hong S.[4]
Ly N.
6-17-5
Tomic B.
Dostanic S.
6-42-66-1
Jasika O.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Boulais J.
7-54-66-4
Schoolkate T.[8]
Sekulic P.
3-67-636-1
Kingsley C.
Mochizuki Y.
6-44-66-3
Johnson S.[2]
Harris B.
7-656-4