Tung Lin Wu vs Christian Langmo — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE3
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#464ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Wu T.
6-4 6-4
Langmo C.
Wu T.
662
Langmo C.
440

Tung Lin Wu defeated Christian Langmo 6-4 6-4 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
22
Break points saved·Even
84
88
Break points won·Slight edge
6
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+122 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1254
7.1Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.9
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Langmo C.
Freshness·Clear edge
85
98

Wu T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Langmo C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Kingsley C.
6-27-66
Johnson S.[2]
Sandgren T.[5]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mayo A.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[5]
Hong S.[4]
6-46-2
Kingsley C.
Wu T.[3]
6-36-2
Johnson S.[2]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.[3]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Schoolkate T.[8]
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Hong S.[4]
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.[5]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Walton A.[7]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5
R32
Kirchheimer S.
Damm M.
6-747-657-64
Sweeny D.[6]
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Spizzirri E.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Blanch U.
Mchugh A.
7-626-4
Walton A.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Lapadat J.
7-56-3
Vallejo A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-1
Wu T.[3]
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Ponwith N.
6-46-1
Hong S.[4]
Ly N.
6-17-5
Tomic B.
Dostanic S.
6-42-66-1
Jasika O.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Boulais J.
7-54-66-4
Schoolkate T.[8]
Sekulic P.
3-67-636-1
Kingsley C.
Mochizuki Y.
6-44-66-3
Johnson S.[2]
Harris B.
7-656-4