Juncheng Shang vs Thai Son Kwiatkowski — Washington Qualifying Round 2

Washington · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
CHN1
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
USA12
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Shang J.
7-6 6-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Shang J.
7762
Kwiatkowski T.
6520

Juncheng Shang defeated Thai Son Kwiatkowski 7-6 6-2 in the Washington qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Kwiatkowski T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Kwiatkowski T.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Kwiatkowski T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
6.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Kwiatkowski T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
5
Break points saved·Dominant
96
65
Break points won·Dominant
45
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kwiatkowski T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.7
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
6.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
27°CMainly clear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 51%
Q2
Pannu K.
Kuzuhara B.
3-66-27-66
Svajda Z.[7]
Holt B.[6]
7-633-0
Shang J.[1]
Kwiatkowski T.[12]
7-656-2
Mochizuki S.[5]
Seelig K.[11]
6-36-2
Klahn B.
Shimabukuro S.[2]
7-56-4
Fratangelo B.
Galarneau A.[4]
6-43-66-3
Q1
Shang J.[1]
Brymer G.
6-36-2
Kwiatkowski T.[12]
Polansky P.
6-26-0
Svajda Z.[7]
Harrison R.
6-37-63
Seelig K.[11]
Kittay B.
6-47-5
Galarneau A.[4]
Gomez J.
6-16-0
Holt B.[6]
Fenty A.
7-56-3
Fratangelo B.
Krueger M.[8]
3-67-656-4
Shimabukuro S.[2]
Young D.
6-36-4
Mochizuki S.[5]
Alves M.
6-36-4
Pannu K.
Kudla D.[3]
4-66-36-4
Klahn B.
Trotter J.
6-47-64
Kuzuhara B.
Mukund S.[9]
6-46-2