Steve Johnson vs Eliot Spizzirri — Lexington CH Round of 16

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA2
Steve Johnson
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
Eliot Spizzirri
USA
Eliot Spizzirri
#97ATP
1796ELO
1765Hard ELO
$385kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
Johnson S.
6-3 7-5
Spizzirri E.
Johnson S.
672
Spizzirri E.
350

Steve Johnson defeated Eliot Spizzirri 6-3 7-5 in the Lexington CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Steve Johnson closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Johnson S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Spizzirri E.

Spizzirri E.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Johnson S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Johnson S.Spizzirri E.
—
Serve
54
—
Return
63

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Johnson S.Spizzirri E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johnson S.Spizzirri E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
81
Break points won·Clear edge
10
34
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
95
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johnson S.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Spizzirri E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Kingsley C.
6-27-66
Johnson S.[2]
Sandgren T.[5]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mayo A.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[5]
Hong S.[4]
6-46-2
Kingsley C.
Wu T.[3]
6-36-2
Johnson S.[2]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.[3]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Schoolkate T.[8]
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Hong S.[4]
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.[5]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Walton A.[7]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5
R32
Kirchheimer S.
Damm M.
6-747-657-64
Sweeny D.[6]
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Spizzirri E.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Blanch U.
Mchugh A.
7-626-4
Walton A.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Lapadat J.
7-56-3
Vallejo A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-1
Wu T.[3]
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Ponwith N.
6-46-1
Hong S.[4]
Ly N.
6-17-5
Tomic B.
Dostanic S.
6-42-66-1
Jasika O.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Boulais J.
7-54-66-4
Schoolkate T.[8]
Sekulic P.
3-67-636-1
Kingsley C.
Mochizuki Y.
6-44-66-3
Johnson S.[2]
Harris B.
7-656-4