Omar Jasika vs Ryan Peniston — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Jasika O.
7-5 6-2
Peniston R.
Jasika O.
762
Peniston R.
520

Omar Jasika defeated Ryan Peniston 7-5 6-2 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Omar Jasika closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
0
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
47
60
Break points won·Clear edge
13
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
1
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Peniston R.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
6.3+130 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1441
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Kingsley C.
6-27-66
Johnson S.[2]
Sandgren T.[5]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mayo A.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[5]
Hong S.[4]
6-46-2
Kingsley C.
Wu T.[3]
6-36-2
Johnson S.[2]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.[3]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Schoolkate T.[8]
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Hong S.[4]
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.[5]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Walton A.[7]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5
R32
Kirchheimer S.
Damm M.
6-747-657-64
Sweeny D.[6]
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Spizzirri E.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Blanch U.
Mchugh A.
7-626-4
Walton A.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Lapadat J.
7-56-3
Vallejo A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-1
Wu T.[3]
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Ponwith N.
6-46-1
Hong S.[4]
Ly N.
6-17-5
Tomic B.
Dostanic S.
6-42-66-1
Jasika O.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Boulais J.
7-54-66-4
Schoolkate T.[8]
Sekulic P.
3-67-636-1
Kingsley C.
Mochizuki Y.
6-44-66-3
Johnson S.[2]
Harris B.
7-656-4