Seong Chan Hong vs Nam Hoang Ly — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR4
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Hong S.
6-1 7-5
Ly N.
Hong S.
672
Ly N.
150

Seong Chan Hong defeated Nam Hoang Ly 6-1 7-5 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Seong Chan Hong came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Ly N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Ly N.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.7
Surface form
1.6
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Cazaux A.[1]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Kingsley C.
6-27-66
Johnson S.[2]
Sandgren T.[5]
7-616-3
Quarter-finals
Cazaux A.[1]
Mayo A.
6-16-4
Sandgren T.[5]
Hong S.[4]
6-46-2
Kingsley C.
Wu T.[3]
6-36-2
Johnson S.[2]
Blanch U.
6-36-4
R16
Wu T.[3]
Vallejo A.
6-47-64
Mayo A.
Schoolkate T.[8]
3-66-46-3
Cazaux A.[1]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Hong S.[4]
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Sandgren T.[5]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-4
Blanch U.
Walton A.[7]
6-36-3
Kingsley C.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-47-5
Johnson S.[2]
Spizzirri E.
6-37-5
R32
Kirchheimer S.
Damm M.
6-747-657-64
Sweeny D.[6]
Boyer T.
6-36-4
Spizzirri E.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Blanch U.
Mchugh A.
7-626-4
Walton A.[7]
Janvier M.
4-66-36-3
Sandgren T.[5]
Lapadat J.
7-56-3
Vallejo A.
Bolt A.
6-44-66-1
Wu T.[3]
Langmo C.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Ponwith N.
6-46-1
Hong S.[4]
Ly N.
6-17-5
Tomic B.
Dostanic S.
6-42-66-1
Jasika O.
Peniston R.
7-56-2
Cazaux A.[1]
Boulais J.
7-54-66-4
Schoolkate T.[8]
Sekulic P.
3-67-636-1
Kingsley C.
Mochizuki Y.
6-44-66-3
Johnson S.[2]
Harris B.
7-656-4