Juncheng Shang vs Emilio Gomez — Washington Round of 64

Washington · ATP · Round of 64
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Shang J.
6-3 6-3
Gomez E.
Shang J.
662
Gomez E.
330

Juncheng Shang defeated Emilio Gomez 6-3 6-3 in the Washington round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve advantage — Shang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Gomez E.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 55). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shang J.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
77
Break points won·Dominant
45
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
23
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.2
Surface form
4.1
Fatigue & Travel
6.1
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
5.1
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
27°CMainly clear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 51%
Final
Evans D.[9]
Griekspoor T.[12]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Evans D.[9]
Dimitrov G.[5]
6-37-64
Griekspoor T.[12]
Fritz T.[1]
3-66-36-2
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[1]
Thompson J.
6-36-3
Evans D.[9]
Tiafoe F.[2]
6-47-5
Dimitrov G.[5]
Humbert U.[13]
W/O
Griekspoor T.[12]
Wolf J.[16]
7-56-4
R16
Evans D.[9]
Shevchenko A.
6-46-3
Fritz T.[1]
Murray A.[15]
6-726-36-4
Thompson J.
Eubanks C.[11]
6-26-2
Wolf J.[16]
Mmoh M.
6-47-65
Griekspoor T.[12]
Monfils G.
6-41-66-3
Dimitrov G.[5]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-3
Tiafoe F.[2]
Shang J.
6-26-3
Humbert U.[13]
Watanuki Y.
6-06-2
R32
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.[7]
7-56-4
Watanuki Y.
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
7-6107-63
Tiafoe F.[2]
Karatsev A.
7-657-65
Dimitrov G.[5]
Mcdonald M.
7-666-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Nishioka Y.[10]
6-756-46-2
Humbert U.[13]
Kokkinakis T.
7-661-66-4
Fritz T.[1]
Svajda Z.
6-36-3
Murray A.[15]
Nakashima B.
7-656-4
Eubanks C.[11]
Shimabukuro S.
6-36-4
Mmoh M.
Hurkacz H.[4]
6-36-747-64
Wolf J.[16]
Albot R.
6-16-3
Griekspoor T.[12]
Broady L.
6-46-2
Monfils G.
Bublik A.[6]
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Korda S.[8]
5-77-646-4
Evans D.[9]
Barrere G.
2-66-06-3
Shang J.
Shelton B.[14]
6-23-66-3
R64
Nakashima B.
Vukic A.
7-657-69
Shimabukuro S.
Harris L.
6-46-3
Watanuki Y.
Wu Y.
1-4
Barrere G.
Mochizuki S.
6-46-776-3
Broady L.
Moutet C.
7-606-4
Thompson J.
Anderson K.
6-46-716-1
Svajda Z.
Purcell M.
4-67-627-5
Albot R.
Giron M.
6-35-77-5
Monfils G.
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Mcdonald M.
Schwartzman D.
6-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Lestienne C.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.
Daniel T.
2-66-46-4
Shevchenko A.
Cressy M.
6-37-68
Shang J.
Gomez E.
6-36-3
Karatsev A.
Pannu K.
7-636-1
Mmoh M.
Klahn B.
6-36-3