Nerman Fatic vs David Goffin — San Marino CH Quarter-final

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
David Goffin
BEL3
David Goffin
#251ATP
1665ELO
1637Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Fatic N.
6-2 6-3
Goffin D.
Fatic N.
662
Goffin D.
230

Nerman Fatic defeated David Goffin 6-2 6-3 in the San Marino CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Goffin D.

Goffin D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Serve advantage — Goffin D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Goffin D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 184). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Goffin D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
82
Break points saved·Dominant
63
96
Break points won·Dominant
36
64
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Goffin D.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.0Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
7.0+159 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1665
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
6.2
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Pellegrino A.
Fatic N.
3-66-30-0
Munar J.[2]
Rincon D.
0-66-16-2
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Delbonis F.
6-47-5
Pellegrino A.
Weis A.
7-637-63
Rincon D.
Fognini F.[4]
6-746-46-4
Fatic N.
Goffin D.[3]
6-26-3
R16
Munar J.[2]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-16-2
Rincon D.
Coppejans K.[6]
6-36-2
Fognini F.[4]
Lavagno E.
6-37-5
Delbonis F.
Giannessi A.
6-35-76-1
Fatic N.
Jacquet K.
7-56-4
Goffin D.[3]
Sachko V.
6-706-26-2
Weis A.
Vacherot V.
6-43-67-63
Pellegrino A.
Dalla Valle E.
6-41-66-1
R32
Munar J.[2]
Passaro F.
6-46-4
Rincon D.
Serafini M.
7-657-64
Weis A.
Mager G.
7-51-1
Pellegrino A.
Dougaz A.
6-34-1
Sachko V.
Ionel N.
6-42-66-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Taberner C.
2-66-27-5
Giannessi A.
Echargui M.
1-66-46-4
Delbonis F.
Polmans M.[8]
6-16-3
Fognini F.[4]
Collarini A.
6-06-1
Lavagno E.
De Rossi M.
6-36-4
Coppejans K.[6]
Madaras D.
6-46-4
Jacquet K.
Cobolli F.[5]
6-34-66-1
Fatic N.
Burruchaga R.
6-33-66-3
Goffin D.[3]
Gaio F.
6-27-5
Vacherot V.
Kolar Z.[7]
6-26-3
Dalla Valle E.
Muller A.[1]
6-36-4