Antoine Escoffier vs Altug Celikbilek — Porto CH Round of 16

Porto CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA7
Antoine Escoffier
#581ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Escoffier A.
6-4 7-6
Celikbilek A.
Escoffier A.
67112
Celikbilek A.
4690

Antoine Escoffier defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-4 7-6 in the Porto CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.1
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
68
73
Break points won·Clear edge
18
38
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
57
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.5
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
3.9
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[4]
Sousa J.
5-76-46-1
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[4]
Escoffier A.[7]
7-636-4
Sousa J.
Marie J.
7-646-0
Quarter-finals
Escoffier A.[7]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[4]
Andreev A.
6-46-3
Sousa J.
Herbert P.
7-646-2
Marie J.
Yevseyev D.
3-67-676-4
R16
Sousa J.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-2
Diez S.
Rocha H.
6-36-2
Yevseyev D.
Nava E.[6]
3-66-37-5
Marie J.
Elias G.
6-46-3
Escoffier A.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-69
Nardi L.[4]
Oliveira G.
6-43-66-3
Andreev A.
Gojowczyk P.
2-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Faria J.
6-716-46-4
R32
Nardi L.[4]
Mejia N.
3-66-26-3
Nava E.[6]
Haerteis J.
7-637-62
Escoffier A.[7]
Giustino L.
6-36-4
Oliveira G.
Poullain L.
6-46-0
Gojowczyk P.
Berankis R.[8]
2-66-47-65
Herbert P.
Lokoli L.
6-46-4
Andreev A.
Palan D.
6-37-62
Elias G.
Halys Q.[1]
7-57-5
Yevseyev D.
Domingues J.
6-23-66-3
Kachmazov A.
De Schepper K.
6-46-4
Sousa J.
Bellucci M.[5]
6-756-46-4
Faria J.
Grenier H.[3]
6-46-3
Diez S.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-46-4
Rocha H.
Strombachs R.
6-44-66-4
Celikbilek A.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-766-3
Marie J.
Lock B.
6-36-4