Sebastian Baez vs Hamad Medjedovic — Kitzbuhel Round of 32

Kitzbuhel · ATP · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 31 July 2023
clay
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
Baez S.
6-4 6-2
Medjedovic H.
Baez S.
662
Medjedovic H.
420

Sebastian Baez defeated Hamad Medjedovic 6-4 6-2 in the Kitzbuhel round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Baez came in ranked #56.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Medjedovic H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Medjedovic H.
7
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Medjedovic H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
8.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Medjedovic H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
87
74
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Dominant
86
39
Deciding sets·Even
88
90
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
83
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Medjedovic H.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.9Clay Elo 1718
Surface ELO
6.1+99 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1841
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
5.0
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Medjedovic H.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Medjedovic H.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 61%
Final
Baez S.
Thiem D.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Baez S.
Etcheverry T.[1]
7-653-66-4
Thiem D.
Djere L.[5]
6-737-57-68
Quarter-finals
Etcheverry T.[1]
Galan D.
6-766-36-4
Baez S.
Molcan A.
6-46-3
Djere L.[5]
Cachin P.[3]
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Rinderknech A.
4-66-36-4
R16
Galan D.
Altmaier D.[8]
3-66-27-68
Rinderknech A.
Hanfmann Y.[2]
7-636-3
Molcan A.
Ofner S.[4]
4-67-57-65
Baez S.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-16-2
Djere L.[5]
Seyboth Wild T.
7-656-3
Cachin P.[3]
Ramos A.
7-56-3
Thiem D.
Zhang Z.
1-66-36-2
Etcheverry T.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-26-2
R32
Thiem D.
Bagnis F.
7-637-66
Zhang Z.
Lajovic D.[7]
6-36-2
Andreozzi G.
Misolic F.
5-76-46-2
Galan D.
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[8]
Huesler M.
6-756-26-4
Molcan A.
Van Assche L.
6-46-3
Baez S.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-2
Djere L.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-64
Seyboth Wild T.
Novak D.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.
Cerundolo J.
6-736-46-2
Ramos A.
Varillas J.
6-17-5
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Pella G.
6-26-4