Jakub Mensik vs Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna — Zug CH Round of 32

Zug CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jakub Mensik
CZE
Jakub Mensik
#19ATP
1931ELO
1861Clay ELO
$2.0MYTD
$6.9MCAREER
20 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
clay
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
ARG
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
1331ELO
1322Clay ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Mensik J.
6-4 6-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Mensik J.
662
Rodriguez Taverna S.
430

Jakub Mensik defeated Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 6-4 6-3 in the Zug CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jakub Mensik closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mensik J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rodriguez Taverna S.

Rodriguez Taverna S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mensik J.

Serve advantage — Mensik J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mensik J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mensik J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
38
Break points saved·Dominant
98
72
Break points won·Dominant
77
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mensik J.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Rodriguez Taverna S.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+539 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1322
10.0Overall Elo 1931
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mensik J.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
82

Mensik J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Rodriguez Taverna S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
De Loore J.
3-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Rinderknech A.[1]
Rodionov J.[3]
4-67-56-2
De Loore J.
Fognini F.[4]
7-636-1
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-37-5
De Loore J.
Gigante M.
3-67-656-4
Fognini F.[4]
Mensik J.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Andreev A.
6-26-2
R16
Rinderknech A.[1]
Travaglia S.
4-66-46-3
Andreev A.
Mayot H.[6]
7-651-66-4
Gigante M.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-47-65
De Loore J.
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-746-3
Fognini F.[4]
Dougaz A.
1-67-656-0
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[7]
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Virtanen O.[5]
2-67-676-3
Rodionov J.[3]
Madaras D.
6-26-4
R32
De Loore J.
Stricker D.[2]
4-67-56-3
Fognini F.[4]
Feldbausch K.
6-46-2
Mensik J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-46-3
Bergs Z.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Madaras D.
Bertola R.
6-26-3
Rodionov J.[3]
Medjedovic H.
6-37-5
Travaglia S.
Brunold M.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Ferrari G.
7-636-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Kirkin E.
7-636-4
Andreev A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Dietrich D.
6-26-1
Gigante M.
Svrcina D.
6-16-726-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Handel T.
6-26-1
Blancaneaux G.
Guinard M.
6-35-77-66
Dougaz A.
Sels J.
6-36-4
Mayot H.[6]
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-46-2