Emilio Gomez vs Gonzalo Lama — Salinas CH Round of 32

Salinas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU1
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
hard
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Gomez E.
7-6 6-2
Lama G.
Gomez E.
7762
Lama G.
6420

Emilio Gomez defeated Gonzalo Lama 7-6 6-2 in the Salinas CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Gomez closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Lama G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Lama G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
51%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Lama G.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
35
Break points saved·Even
77
75
Break points won·Clear edge
19
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lama G.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
0.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Pecotic M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Pecotic M.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Marchenko I.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
7-606-4
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Shelbayh A.[6]
7-51-66-4
Pecotic M.
Jasika O.
6-37-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Zhukayev B.[7]
7-696-766-4
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.[2]
6-33-67-62
R16
Marchenko I.
Donskoy E.[8]
7-57-5
Zhukayev B.[7]
Sekulic P.
7-636-3
Noguchi R.[2]
Andrade A.
7-636-1
Shelbayh A.[6]
Tomic B.
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[4]
6-12-66-4
Pecotic M.
Sweeny D.[5]
7-686-1
Jasika O.
Gomez E.[1]
7-56-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Bolt A.
3-66-47-69
R32
Jasika O.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-67
Marchenko I.
Kumar O.
3-66-36-4
Uchida K.[4]
Langmo C.
7-660-66-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Alves M.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Boyer T.
7-636-756-4
Zhukayev B.[7]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Gomez E.[1]
Lama G.
7-646-2
Noguchi R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-47-5
Tomic B.
Damm M.
3-66-16-4
Celikbilek A.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[8]
Guillen Meza A.
6-42-66-3
Sweeny D.[5]
Tu L.
6-44-66-2
Sekulic P.
Cozbinov A.
7-666-4
Andrade A.
Bernard A.
6-26-2
Bolt A.
Diaz Jalil A.
7-57-62