David Goffin vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Verona CH Round of 16

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
David Goffin
BEL1
David Goffin
#251ATP
1665ELO
1637Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Goffin D.
7-5 6-0
Tseng C.
Goffin D.
762
Tseng C.
500

David Goffin defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 7-5 6-0 in the Verona CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — David Goffin came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. David Goffin extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-05-18Roland GarrosQFclayDavid Goffin6-3 6-1
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersQ1hardChun Hsin Tseng6-4 6-1
2022-08-15Cincinnati MastersQ2hardDavid Goffin3-6 6-3 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Goffin D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Goffin D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Goffin D.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Goffin D.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
83
Break points won·Dominant
64
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Goffin D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Tseng C.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+96 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1541
6.7Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1554
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
0.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.
Sachko V.[9]
1-67-636-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.
Bourgue M.
6-726-36-2
Sachko V.[9]
Goffin D.[1]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.[1]
Napolitano S.
1-66-16-2
Kopriva V.
Darderi L.
4-66-16-0
Bourgue M.
Passaro F.[5]
6-42-66-4
Sachko V.[9]
Comesana F.
7-56-3
R16
Bourgue M.
Vesely J.
3-66-16-4
Napolitano S.
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-3
Comesana F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-4
Kopriva V.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Lavagno E.
6-46-3
Passaro F.[5]
Gaio F.
6-7116-46-2
Sachko V.[9]
Hassan B.
6-26-2
Goffin D.[1]
Tseng C.
7-56-0
R32
Trungelliti M.
Gaston H.[2]
3-66-25-2
Neumayer L.
Olivieri G.[8]
7-50-0
Kopriva V.
Royer V.
7-666-3
Lavagno E.
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-36-1
Darderi L.
Hardt N.
6-46-0
Bourgue M.
Martinez P.[3]
5-76-26-2
Vesely J.
Delbonis F.
6-26-746-3
Gaio F.
Nagal S.
6-736-36-2
Passaro F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-726-26-4
Comesana F.
Polmans M.[6]
7-656-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Taberner C.
1-66-16-4
Hassan B.
Burruchaga R.
7-54-67-65
Sachko V.[9]
Andreozzi G.
2-67-656-4
Napolitano S.
Caruso S.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Houkes M.
4-67-56-3
Goffin D.[1]
Fatic N.
6-46-3