David Goffin vs Nerman Fatic — Verona CH Round of 32

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
David Goffin
BEL1
David Goffin
#251ATP
1665ELO
1637Clay ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Goffin D.
6-4 6-3
Fatic N.
Goffin D.
662
Fatic N.
430

David Goffin defeated Nerman Fatic 6-4 6-3 in the Verona CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: David Goffin closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Goffin D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Goffin D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Goffin D.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Goffin D.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
24
Break points saved·Dominant
96
63
Break points won·Dominant
64
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Goffin D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Fatic N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.0+159 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.0Clay Elo 1478
7.1Overall Elo 1665
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
3.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.
Sachko V.[9]
1-67-636-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.
Bourgue M.
6-726-36-2
Sachko V.[9]
Goffin D.[1]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Goffin D.[1]
Napolitano S.
1-66-16-2
Kopriva V.
Darderi L.
4-66-16-0
Bourgue M.
Passaro F.[5]
6-42-66-4
Sachko V.[9]
Comesana F.
7-56-3
R16
Bourgue M.
Vesely J.
3-66-16-4
Napolitano S.
Neumayer L.
4-66-26-3
Comesana F.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-4
Kopriva V.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-2
Darderi L.
Lavagno E.
6-46-3
Passaro F.[5]
Gaio F.
6-7116-46-2
Sachko V.[9]
Hassan B.
6-26-2
Goffin D.[1]
Tseng C.
7-56-0
R32
Trungelliti M.
Gaston H.[2]
3-66-25-2
Neumayer L.
Olivieri G.[8]
7-50-0
Kopriva V.
Royer V.
7-666-3
Lavagno E.
Ugo Carabelli C.[7]
6-36-1
Darderi L.
Hardt N.
6-46-0
Bourgue M.
Martinez P.[3]
5-76-26-2
Vesely J.
Delbonis F.
6-26-746-3
Gaio F.
Nagal S.
6-736-36-2
Passaro F.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-726-26-4
Comesana F.
Polmans M.[6]
7-656-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Taberner C.
1-66-16-4
Hassan B.
Burruchaga R.
7-54-67-65
Sachko V.[9]
Andreozzi G.
2-67-656-4
Napolitano S.
Caruso S.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Houkes M.
4-67-56-3
Goffin D.[1]
Fatic N.
6-46-3