Bernard Tomic vs Martin Damm — Salinas CH Round of 32

Salinas CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Tomic B.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Damm M.
Tomic B.
3662
Damm M.
6141

Bernard Tomic defeated Martin Damm 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Salinas CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
12.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
26
Break points saved·Even
92
93
Break points won·Even
4
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Damm M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.8Hard Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.2+216 Hard Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Damm M.
Freshness·Clear edge
84
97

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Marchenko I.
Pecotic M.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Pecotic M.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-1
Marchenko I.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
7-606-4
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Shelbayh A.[6]
7-51-66-4
Pecotic M.
Jasika O.
6-37-5
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Zhukayev B.[7]
7-696-766-4
Marchenko I.
Noguchi R.[2]
6-33-67-62
R16
Marchenko I.
Donskoy E.[8]
7-57-5
Zhukayev B.[7]
Sekulic P.
7-636-3
Noguchi R.[2]
Andrade A.
7-636-1
Shelbayh A.[6]
Tomic B.
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[4]
6-12-66-4
Pecotic M.
Sweeny D.[5]
7-686-1
Jasika O.
Gomez E.[1]
7-56-4
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Bolt A.
3-66-47-69
R32
Jasika O.
Walton A.
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-67
Marchenko I.
Kumar O.
3-66-36-4
Uchida K.[4]
Langmo C.
7-660-66-0
Mpetshi Perricard G.[3]
Alves M.
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Boyer T.
7-636-756-4
Zhukayev B.[7]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-36-4
Gomez E.[1]
Lama G.
7-646-2
Noguchi R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-47-5
Tomic B.
Damm M.
3-66-16-4
Celikbilek A.
Mayo A.
6-46-2
Donskoy E.[8]
Guillen Meza A.
6-42-66-3
Sweeny D.[5]
Tu L.
6-44-66-2
Sekulic P.
Cozbinov A.
7-666-4
Andrade A.
Bernard A.
6-26-2
Bolt A.
Diaz Jalil A.
7-57-62