Dominic Thiem vs Facundo Bagnis — Umag Round of 32

Umag · ATP · Round of 32
AUT
Dominic Thiem
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
clay
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Thiem D.
6-4 7-5
Bagnis F.
Thiem D.
672
Bagnis F.
450

Dominic Thiem defeated Facundo Bagnis 6-4 7-5 in the Umag round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Dominic Thiem came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Dominic Thiem extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-31KitzbuhelR32clayDominic Thiem7-6(3) 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Thiem D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thiem D.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.9
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thiem D.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
54
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
92
Break points won·Clear edge
58
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
99
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thiem D.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Bagnis F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.1
Surface form
6.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Popyrin A.
Wawrinka S.[6]
6-756-36-4
Semi-finals
Popyrin A.
Arnaldi M.[4]
6-727-56-3
Wawrinka S.[6]
Sonego L.[2]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Arnaldi M.[4]
Lehecka J.[1]
3-66-26-4
Wawrinka S.[6]
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-47-5
Sonego L.[2]
Munar J.
3-66-16-2
Popyrin A.
Prizmic D.
7-627-5
R16
Arnaldi M.[4]
Cobolli F.[1]
6-37-65
Sonego L.[2]
Cecchinato M.
6-17-67
Wawrinka S.[6]
Coria F.
7-56-1
Munar J.
Marozsan F.[6]
6-46-3
Prizmic D.
Piros Z.
6-26-3
Lehecka J.[1]
Thiem D.
6-37-5
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Daniel T.
6-36-1
Popyrin A.
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-1
R32
Arnaldi M.[4]
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.[1]
Cilic M.
6-46-3
Piros Z.
Oconnell C.[5]
6-36-4
Marozsan F.[6]
Cerundolo J.
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.
Shevchenko A.
4-67-606-3
Coria F.
Huesler M.
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Bagnis F.
6-47-5
Popyrin A.
Bonzi B.
6-47-5
Munar J.
Ramos A.[8]
6-33-66-3
Prizmic D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-2
Wawrinka S.[6]
Misolic F.
6-36-2
Daniel T.
Landaluce M.
1-67-56-2