Adrian Andreev vs Harold Mayot — Zug CH Round of 16

Zug CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BUL
Adrian Andreev
#1122ATP
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 July 2023
clay
Harold Mayot
FRA6
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1546Clay ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
Andreev A.
7-6 1-6 6-4
Mayot H.
Andreev A.
77162
Mayot H.
65641

Adrian Andreev defeated Harold Mayot 7-6 1-6 6-4 in the Zug CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Harold Mayot came in ranked #200, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Adrian Andreev closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Andreev A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Mayot H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Andreev A.

Serve advantage — Mayot H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Andreev A.Mayot H.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andreev A.Mayot H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
29
Break points saved·Dominant
53
92
Break points won·Slight edge
14
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Andreev A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mayot H.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.2
Surface form
4.1
Fatigue & Travel
4.5
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Andreev A.Mayot H.
Freshness·
—
99

Mayot H.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
De Loore J.
3-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Rinderknech A.[1]
Rodionov J.[3]
4-67-56-2
De Loore J.
Fognini F.[4]
7-636-1
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-37-5
De Loore J.
Gigante M.
3-67-656-4
Fognini F.[4]
Mensik J.
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Andreev A.
6-26-2
R16
Rinderknech A.[1]
Travaglia S.
4-66-46-3
Andreev A.
Mayot H.[6]
7-651-66-4
Gigante M.
Kuzmanov D.[8]
6-47-65
De Loore J.
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-746-3
Fognini F.[4]
Dougaz A.
1-67-656-0
Mensik J.
Ritschard A.[7]
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Virtanen O.[5]
2-67-676-3
Rodionov J.[3]
Madaras D.
6-26-4
R32
De Loore J.
Stricker D.[2]
4-67-56-3
Fognini F.[4]
Feldbausch K.
6-46-2
Mensik J.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-46-3
Bergs Z.
Neuchrist M.
6-46-4
Madaras D.
Bertola R.
6-26-3
Rodionov J.[3]
Medjedovic H.
6-37-5
Travaglia S.
Brunold M.
6-36-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Ferrari G.
7-636-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Kirkin E.
7-636-4
Andreev A.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Kuzmanov D.[8]
Dietrich D.
6-26-1
Gigante M.
Svrcina D.
6-16-726-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Handel T.
6-26-1
Blancaneaux G.
Guinard M.
6-35-77-66
Dougaz A.
Sels J.
6-36-4
Mayot H.[6]
Ferreira Silva F.
4-66-46-2