Philip Sekulic vs James Trotter — Granby CH Semi-final

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 July 2023
hard
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Sekulic P.
6-4 2-6 7-6
Trotter J.
Sekulic P.
62772
Trotter J.
46631

Philip Sekulic defeated James Trotter 6-4 2-6 7-6 in the Granby CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Philip Sekulic closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sekulic P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Trotter J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sekulic P.Trotter J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
66%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
8.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sekulic P.Trotter J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
79
90
Break points won·Slight edge
9
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
19
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sekulic P.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 168 days (−1.5)
Trotter J.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
4.2Hard Elo 1363
Surface ELO
5.8+17 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1414
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sekulic P.Trotter J.
Freshness·Dominant
94
61

Sekulic P.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Galarneau A.[7]
Sekulic P.
6-43-66-3
Semi-finals
Galarneau A.[7]
Wu T.
7-646-3
Sekulic P.
Trotter J.
6-42-67-63
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Janvier M.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.
Boulais J.
6-36-2
Galarneau A.[7]
Schoolkate T.
6-46-3
Trotter J.
Mccabe J.
7-686-2
R16
Trotter J.
Kokkinakis T.[1]
7-652-0
Schoolkate T.
Cazaux A.[2]
6-36-3
Sekulic P.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-3
Wu T.
Harrison C.
6-36-4
Boulais J.
Lajal M.
6-41-67-65
Galarneau A.[7]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-27-66
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6-46-2
Janvier M.
Walton A.
6-44-67-64
R32
Sekulic P.
Uchiyama Y.
6-767-646-1
Kudla D.[5]
Moriya H.
6-45-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.[2]
Ly N.
6-17-67
Walton A.
Pospisil V.[4]
6-777-616-1
Janvier M.
Jung J.
7-666-3
Mccabe J.
Sandgren T.
7-646-3
Kokkinakis T.[1]
Kypson P.
6-26-766-4
Trotter J.
Ponwith N.
6-37-61
Harrison C.
Cozbinov A.
6-16-3
Schoolkate T.
Sheehy J.
6-26-3
Boulais J.
Bicknell B.
6-04-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-06-2
Lajal M.
Shang J.[3]
6-26-2
Sweeny D.
Mpetshi Perricard G.[8]
3-66-46-4
Galarneau A.[7]
Jasika O.
6-13-66-3